Sarah Amador
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 2
- Family Practice top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 11
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 2
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 8
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 10
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 2
-
- Sleep and related disorders 3
- Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue 2
- Co-authors
- Claire GoodmanElspeth MathieIna MachenNatasha ElmoreCarole ParsonsAndrea MayrhoferKatherine FroggattDerek King
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (1 paper)International Journal of Nursing Studies (1 paper)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalIndia
In The Last Decade
Sarah Amador
16 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 100
- Family Practice 18
- General Health Professions 175
- Psychiatry and Mental health 85
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 145
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Amador
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Amador's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Amador with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Amador more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Amador
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Amador. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Amador. The network helps show where Sarah Amador may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Amador, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 13 | Evaluation of the End of Life Care Train the Trainer (TTT) Education Model | 2014 | 3 |
| 14 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 71 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 74 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 20 |
About Sarah Amador
Sarah Amador is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (100 citations), Family Practice (18 citations) and General Health Professions (175 citations). Sarah Amador has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and India. Frequent co-authors include Claire Goodman, Elspeth Mathie, Ina Machen, Natasha Elmore, Carole Parsons, Andrea Mayrhofer, Katherine Froggatt, Derek King, Louise Robinson and Elizabeth L Sampson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Nursing Studies and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.