Sara N. Gallant

762 total citations
19 papers, 455 citations indexed

About

Sara N. Gallant is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara N. Gallant has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 455 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sara N. Gallant's work include Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (4 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers). Sara N. Gallant is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (4 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers). Sara N. Gallant collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Sara N. Gallant's co-authors include Lixia Yang, Kang Lee, Rebecca A. Judges, Benjamin J. Dyson, Lingqian Li, Paula Gardner, Celeste Alvaro, Holly J. Bowen, Carson Pun and Mara Mather and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Sara N. Gallant

19 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sara N. Gallant Canada 10 158 158 154 79 57 19 455
Birthe Macdonald Switzerland 10 146 0.9× 70 0.4× 83 0.5× 127 1.6× 75 1.3× 17 488
Débora Areces Spain 13 104 0.7× 194 1.2× 97 0.6× 45 0.6× 37 0.6× 54 581
Kouhei Masumoto Japan 11 60 0.4× 82 0.5× 90 0.6× 134 1.7× 29 0.5× 35 372
Christopher C. Stewart United States 12 38 0.2× 101 0.6× 71 0.5× 62 0.8× 36 0.6× 27 434
Marie Hammer Australia 11 72 0.5× 39 0.2× 51 0.3× 64 0.8× 66 1.2× 26 534
Cristina Dumitrache Spain 10 75 0.5× 18 0.1× 111 0.7× 151 1.9× 43 0.8× 29 421
Alissa Dark-Freudeman United States 8 48 0.3× 82 0.5× 111 0.7× 54 0.7× 15 0.3× 15 301
Neta Spiro United Kingdom 12 65 0.4× 185 1.2× 70 0.5× 221 2.8× 60 1.1× 39 505
A. Fernandez Prieto Spain 7 74 0.5× 92 0.6× 144 0.9× 24 0.3× 12 0.2× 27 382
Jay K. Brinker Australia 10 358 2.3× 57 0.4× 285 1.9× 102 1.3× 53 0.9× 21 583

Countries citing papers authored by Sara N. Gallant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara N. Gallant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara N. Gallant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara N. Gallant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara N. Gallant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara N. Gallant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara N. Gallant. The network helps show where Sara N. Gallant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara N. Gallant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara N. Gallant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara N. Gallant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara N. Gallant. Sara N. Gallant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Bowen, Holly J., et al.. (2023). Reward motivation more consistently modulates memory for younger compared to older adults in a directed forgetting task.. Psychology and Aging. 38(5). 468–482. 1 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Sonja, Sara N. Gallant, Michael J. Cunningham, et al.. (2023). CTNNB1 and APC Mutations in Sinonasal Myxoma. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 47(11). 1291–1300. 2 indexed citations
3.
Mazwi, Mjaye, et al.. (2023). Take a Load Off: Understanding, Measuring, and Reducing Cognitive Load for Cardiologists in High-Stakes Care Environments. Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics. 9(3). 122–135. 4 indexed citations
4.
Laussen, Peter C., Andrew Goodwin, Sebastian D. Goodfellow, et al.. (2022). An integration engineering framework for machine learning in healthcare. Frontiers in Digital Health. 4. 932411–932411. 10 indexed citations
5.
Gallant, Sara N., Kelly A. Durbin, & Mara Mather. (2020). Age differences in vulnerability to distraction under arousal.. Psychology and Aging. 35(5). 780–791. 10 indexed citations
6.
Bowen, Holly J., et al.. (2020). Influence of Reward Motivation on Directed Forgetting in Younger and Older Adults. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 1764–1764. 15 indexed citations
7.
Yang, Lixia, et al.. (2020). Cognitive and Psychosocial Outcomes of Self-Guided Executive Function Training and Low-Intensity Aerobic Exercise in Healthy Older Adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 12. 576744–576744. 5 indexed citations
8.
Gallant, Sara N., Julia Spaniol, & Lixia Yang. (2019). Age differences in cue utilization during prospective and retrospective memory monitoring.. Psychology and Aging. 34(4). 545–557. 6 indexed citations
9.
Gallant, Sara N., et al.. (2019). The effect of emotional distraction on hyper-binding in young and older adults. Cognition & Emotion. 34(4). 839–847. 2 indexed citations
10.
Gallant, Sara N., Carson Pun, & Lixia Yang. (2018). Age differences in the neural correlates underlying control of emotional memory: An event-related potential study. Brain Research. 1697. 83–92. 13 indexed citations
11.
Gallant, Sara N., et al.. (2017). Stereotype Threat Effects on Older Adults’ Episodic and Working Memory: A Meta-Analysis. The Gerontologist. 57(suppl_2). S193–S205. 57 indexed citations
12.
Judges, Rebecca A., Sara N. Gallant, Lixia Yang, & Kang Lee. (2017). The Role of Cognition, Personality, and Trust in Fraud Victimization in Older Adults. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 588–588. 66 indexed citations
13.
Armstrong, Barbara Nachtrieb, et al.. (2017). STEREOTYPE THREAT EFFECTS ON OLDER ADULTS’ MEMORY: A META-ANALYSIS. Innovation in Aging. 1(suppl_1). 1064–1064. 1 indexed citations
14.
Gallant, Sara N.. (2016). Mindfulness meditation practice and executive functioning: Breaking down the benefit. Consciousness and Cognition. 40. 116–130. 180 indexed citations
15.
Gallant, Sara N. & Benjamin J. Dyson. (2016). Neural modulation of directed forgetting by valence and arousal: An event-related potential study. Brain Research. 1648(Pt A). 306–316. 26 indexed citations
16.
Gallant, Sara N., Benjamin J. Dyson, & Lixia Yang. (2016). Local context effects during emotional item directed forgetting in younger and older adults. Memory. 25(8). 1129–1138. 6 indexed citations
17.
Alvaro, Celeste, et al.. (2015). Evaluating Intention and Effect. HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 9(2). 82–104. 31 indexed citations
18.
Gallant, Sara N. & Lixia Yang. (2014). Positivity effect in source attributions of arousal-matched emotional and non-emotional words during item-based directed forgetting. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1334–1334. 19 indexed citations
19.
Walker, Mary E., et al.. (2009). Primary Health Care in South Korea: Does it exist? How can Health Educators and Health Practitioners improve it?. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. 47(4). 128–135. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026