Sara Laureen Bartels
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Marjolein de VugtFrans R.J. VerheyRosalia J. M. van KnippenbergHannah Liane ChristieLizzy BootsHuibert TangeCamilla MalinowskyPhilippe Delespaul
- Topics
- Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEClinical Psychology Review
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sara Laureen Bartels
27 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Psychiatry and Mental health 122
- General Health Professions 100
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
- Applied Psychology 69
- Clinical Psychology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Laureen Bartels
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Laureen Bartels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Laureen Bartels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Laureen Bartels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Laureen Bartels
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Laureen Bartels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Laureen Bartels. The network helps show where Sara Laureen Bartels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Laureen Bartels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Laureen Bartels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Laureen Bartels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Laureen Bartels. Sara Laureen Bartels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 96 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Sara Laureen Bartels
Sara Laureen Bartels is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (69 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (122 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations). Sara Laureen Bartels has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marjolein de Vugt, Frans R.J. Verhey, Rosalia J. M. van Knippenberg, Hannah Liane Christie, Lizzy Boots, Huibert Tange, Camilla Malinowsky, Philippe Delespaul, Simone Verhagen and Ann‐Helen Patomella. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.