Sara Borrelli

505 citations
31 papers · 344 indexed · h-index 10

Sara Borrelli

29 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Sara Borrelli
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 259
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 123
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 163
  • Clinical Psychology 73
Replace Tine Schauer Eri with:
Tine Schauer Eri Norway
Antonella Nespoli Italy
Unn Dahlberg Norway
Joan Skinner New Zealand
Priscilla Hall United States
Helga Gottfreðsdóttir Iceland
Patricia McNiven Canada
Sigríður Sía Jónsdóttir Iceland
Rüveyde Aydın Türkiye
Elizabeth Newnham Australia
Sara Borrelli relative to Tine Schauer Eri Norway Tine Schauer Eri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Tine Schauer Eri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Borrelli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Borrelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Borrelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Borrelli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Borrelli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Borrelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Borrelli. The network helps show where Sara Borrelli may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Sara Borrelli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Borrelli Line = papers co-authored together Sara Borrelli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20241
3 20236
4 20231
5 20234
6 20224
7 20226
8 202216
9 202117
10 20212
11 202014
12
Introducing midwifery students to the world of research: building the basis for future leaders in evidence-based practice
20203
13 20202
14 201844
15 201737
16 201638
17
Early labour midwifery care in Italy: local and cross-cultural challenges
20145
18
What is a good midwife? Some historical considerations
20132
19 201345
20
European Plasma Working Group: Status of Activities and Future Plans
20031

About Sara Borrelli

Sara Borrelli is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research and Theory and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (21 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (6 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (4 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (259 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (123 citations). Sara Borrelli has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Denis Walsh, Antonella Nespoli, Simona Fumagalli, Helen Spiby, Sara Ornaghi, Patrizia Vergani, Laura Antolini, A. Rota, Catrin Evans and Kerry Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, Women and Birth, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today and International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026