Nadia Müller

2.3k total citations
29 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Nadia Müller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Müller has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Sensory Systems and 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nadia Müller's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (17 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers). Nadia Müller is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (17 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers). Nadia Müller collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Italy and France. Nadia Müller's co-authors include Nathan Weisz, Thomas Hartmann, Isabel Lorenz, Julian Keil, Jonas Obleser, Winfried Schlee, Berthold Langguth, Olivier Bertrand, Niklas Ihssen and Julia Frey and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Müller

29 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nadia Müller Germany 19 1.4k 399 354 333 122 29 1.7k
William Sedley United Kingdom 21 1.4k 1.0× 806 2.0× 332 0.9× 319 1.0× 70 0.6× 45 1.6k
Phillip E. Gander United States 21 1.4k 1.0× 754 1.9× 289 0.8× 337 1.0× 51 0.4× 49 1.6k
Stephan Moratti Spain 24 2.2k 1.6× 373 0.9× 495 1.4× 208 0.6× 169 1.4× 66 2.5k
Jeremy D. Thorne Germany 20 1.3k 1.0× 116 0.3× 487 1.4× 296 0.9× 124 1.0× 32 1.6k
Roberto Martuzzi Switzerland 21 1.5k 1.1× 174 0.4× 491 1.4× 159 0.5× 258 2.1× 34 2.0k
Till R. Schneider Germany 22 2.1k 1.5× 247 0.6× 552 1.6× 504 1.5× 191 1.6× 62 2.4k
Sundeep Teki United Kingdom 21 1.5k 1.1× 163 0.4× 431 1.2× 124 0.4× 129 1.1× 32 1.7k
Sander Martens Netherlands 25 2.1k 1.5× 255 0.6× 772 2.2× 129 0.4× 274 2.2× 65 2.5k
Pascale Sandmann Germany 24 1.6k 1.2× 205 0.5× 652 1.8× 389 1.2× 53 0.4× 44 1.8k
Michael Schwartze Germany 23 1.7k 1.2× 150 0.4× 551 1.6× 203 0.6× 318 2.6× 68 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Müller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Müller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Müller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Müller. The network helps show where Nadia Müller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Müller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Müller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Müller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Müller. Nadia Müller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rampp, Stefan, et al.. (2024). Decreasing alpha flow releases task-specific processing paths. Imaging Neuroscience. 2. 3 indexed citations
2.
Rampp, Stefan, Martin Kaltenhäuser, Nadia Müller, et al.. (2023). MEG Node Degree for Focus Localization: Comparison with Invasive EEG. Biomedicines. 11(2). 438–438. 3 indexed citations
3.
Becker, Linda, et al.. (2022). Higher Peripheral Inflammation Is Associated With Lower Orbitofrontal Gamma Power in Chronic Tinnitus. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 16. 883926–883926. 7 indexed citations
4.
Wutz, Andreas, et al.. (2019). Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(32). 16056–16061. 30 indexed citations
5.
Leske, Sabine, Philipp Ruhnau, Julia Frey, et al.. (2015). Prestimulus Network Integration of Auditory Cortex Predisposes Near-Threshold Perception Independently of Local Excitability. Cerebral Cortex. 25(12). 4898–4907. 37 indexed citations
6.
Frey, Julia, et al.. (2014). Selective Modulation of Auditory Cortical Alpha Activity in an Audiovisual Spatial Attention Task. Journal of Neuroscience. 34(19). 6634–6639. 80 indexed citations
7.
Müller, Nadia, et al.. (2014). Listen to Yourself: The Medial Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Auditory Alpha Power During Speech Preparation. Cerebral Cortex. 25(11). 4029–4037. 9 indexed citations
8.
Schulz, H., et al.. (2013). Now I am Ready--Now I am not: The Influence of Pre-TMS Oscillations and Corticomuscular Coherence on Motor-Evoked Potentials. Cerebral Cortex. 24(7). 1708–1719. 86 indexed citations
9.
Leske, Sabine, Nikolaas N. Oosterhof, Thomas Hartmann, et al.. (2013). The strength of alpha and beta oscillations parametrically scale with the strength of an illusory auditory percept. NeuroImage. 88. 69–78. 40 indexed citations
10.
Keil, Julian, Nadia Müller, Thomas Hartmann, & Nathan Weisz. (2013). Prestimulus Beta Power and Phase Synchrony Influence the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. Cerebral Cortex. 24(5). 1278–1288. 73 indexed citations
11.
Weisz, Nathan, et al.. (2013). Oscillatory Alpha Modulations in Right Auditory Regions Reflect the Validity of Acoustic Cues in an Auditory Spatial Attention Task. Cerebral Cortex. 24(10). 2579–2590. 48 indexed citations
12.
Hartmann, Thomas, Isabel Lorenz, Nadia Müller, Berthold Langguth, & Nathan Weisz. (2013). The Effects of Neurofeedback on Oscillatory Processes Related to Tinnitus. Brain Topography. 27(1). 149–157. 56 indexed citations
13.
14.
Keil, Julian, Nadia Müller, Niklas Ihssen, & Nathan Weisz. (2011). On the Variability of the McGurk Effect: Audiovisual Integration Depends on Prestimulus Brain States. Cerebral Cortex. 22(1). 221–231. 106 indexed citations
15.
Müller, Nadia & Nathan Weisz. (2011). Lateralized Auditory Cortical Alpha Band Activity and Interregional Connectivity Pattern Reflect Anticipation of Target Sounds. Cerebral Cortex. 22(7). 1604–1613. 79 indexed citations
16.
Weisz, Nathan, Françoise Lecaignard, Nadia Müller, & Olivier Bertrand. (2011). The modulatory influence of a predictive cue on the auditory steady‐state response. Human Brain Mapping. 33(6). 1417–1430. 11 indexed citations
17.
Ortmann, Magdalene, Nadia Müller, Winfried Schlee, & Nathan Weisz. (2010). Rapid increases of gamma power in the auditory cortex following noise trauma in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience. 33(3). 568–575. 65 indexed citations
18.
Obermann, Ellen C., et al.. (2010). Klonale Verwandtschaft von Hodgkin-Lymphomen und deren Rezidiven. Der Pathologe. 31(S2). 132–133. 1 indexed citations
19.
Müller, Nadia. (2009). Top-down modulation of the auditory steady-state response in a task-switch paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 3. 1–1. 426 indexed citations
20.
Lorenz, Isabel, Nadia Müller, Winfried Schlee, Thomas Hartmann, & Nathan Weisz. (2009). Loss of alpha power is related to increased gamma synchronization—A marker of reduced inhibition in tinnitus?. Neuroscience Letters. 453(3). 225–228. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William Sedley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Phillip E. Gander Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephan Moratti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeremy D. Thorne Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roberto Martuzzi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Till R. Schneider Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sundeep Teki Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sander Martens Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pascale Sandmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Schwartze
Rankless by CCL
2026