Sandra S. de Vries

1.2k total citations
7 papers, 773 citations indexed

About

Sandra S. de Vries is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra S. de Vries has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 773 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 1 paper in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 1 paper in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Sandra S. de Vries's work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers). Sandra S. de Vries is often cited by papers focused on Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers). Sandra S. de Vries collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Sandra S. de Vries's co-authors include Ritsert C. Jansen, Remond J.A. Fijneman, Peter Démant, Dirk G. de Rooij, Esther B. Baart, P. de Boer, Marleen Dekker, Hein te Riele, Jop Kind and Kim L. de Luca and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Genetics and Genes & Development.

In The Last Decade

Sandra S. de Vries

7 papers receiving 760 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sandra S. de Vries Netherlands	7	612	209	101	96	90	7	773
Andrew Fedoriw United States	12	681 1.1×	294 1.4×	58 0.6×	52 0.5×	71 0.8×	14	764
Yilu Lu China	13	384 0.6×	121 0.6×	223 2.2×	124 1.3×	55 0.6×	29	593
Mélanie Eckersley-Maslin United Kingdom	13	1.1k 1.8×	246 1.2×	118 1.2×	113 1.2×	108 1.2×	23	1.2k
Yosuke Ichijima Japan	11	729 1.2×	174 0.8×	105 1.0×	104 1.1×	63 0.7×	12	823
Karen Fancher United States	7	563 0.9×	151 0.7×	54 0.5×	54 0.6×	197 2.2×	8	698
Elisabeth Simboeck Austria	9	775 1.3×	102 0.5×	69 0.7×	143 1.5×	17 0.2×	11	872
Marie L. Rossi United States	13	837 1.4×	93 0.4×	161 1.6×	132 1.4×	26 0.3×	15	894
Ron Hochstenbach Netherlands	11	306 0.5×	340 1.6×	47 0.5×	162 1.7×	35 0.4×	18	512
Candice L. Wike United States	8	829 1.4×	173 0.8×	54 0.5×	151 1.6×	155 1.7×	11	954
Naoe Kotomura Japan	10	348 0.6×	121 0.6×	91 0.9×	46 0.5×	20 0.2×	19	431

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra S. de Vries

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra S. de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra S. de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra S. de Vries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra S. de Vries

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra S. de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra S. de Vries. The network helps show where Sandra S. de Vries may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra S. de Vries

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra S. de Vries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra S. de Vries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra S. de Vries. Sandra S. de Vries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Rang, Franka J., Kim L. de Luca, Sandra S. de Vries, et al.. (2022). Single-cell profiling of transcriptome and histone modifications with EpiDamID. Molecular Cell. 82(10). 1956–1970.e14. 31 indexed citations

2.

Rang, Franka J., Koos Rooijers, Sandra S. de Vries, et al.. (2020). Simultaneous quantification of protein–DNA interactions and transcriptomes in single cells with scDam&T-seq. Nature Protocols. 15(6). 1922–1953. 21 indexed citations

3.

Rooijers, Koos, Franka J. Rang, Sandra S. de Vries, et al.. (2019). Simultaneous quantification of protein–DNA contacts and transcriptomes in single cells. Nature Biotechnology. 37(7). 766–772. 78 indexed citations

4.

Borsos, Máté, Tamás Schauer, Julien Pontabry, et al.. (2019). Genome–lamina interactions are established de novo in the early mouse embryo. Nature. 569(7758). 729–733. 99 indexed citations

5.

Lenain, Christelle, Carolyn A. de Graaf, Ludo Pagie, et al.. (2017). Massive reshaping of genome–nuclear lamina interactions during oncogene-induced senescence. Genome Research. 27(10). 1634–1644. 65 indexed citations

6.

Vries, Sandra S. de, Esther B. Baart, Marleen Dekker, et al.. (1999). Mouse MutS-like protein Msh5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes & Development. 13(5). 523–531. 282 indexed citations

7.

Fijneman, Remond J.A., Sandra S. de Vries, Ritsert C. Jansen, & Peter Démant. (1996). Complex interactions of new quantitative trait loci, Sluc1, Sluc2, Sluc3, and Sluc4, that influence the susceptibility to lung cancer in the mouse. Nature Genetics. 14(4). 465–467. 197 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact