Sandra Rees

7.2k citations
142 papers · 5.6k indexed · h-index 45

Sandra Rees

142 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Peers

Sandra Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 3.1k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 512
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 810
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 639
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 253
Replace David W. Walker with:
David W. Walker Australia
Jean Sands United Kingdom
Sachio Takashima Japan
Stephen A. Back United States
Marjorie R. Grafe United States
Stefano Luisi Italy
Stéphane Sizonenko Switzerland
Harvey B. Sarnat Canada
Daniel L. Marks United States
Barbara Clancy United States
Sandra Rees relative to David W. Walker Australia David W. Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David W. Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Rees. The network helps show where Sandra Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Rees Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20196
2 201518
3 20143
4 200779
5 2007118
6 2007118
7 200610
8 20059
9 200461
10 200472
11 200412
12 200330
13
Repeated exposure to bacterial endotoxin during gestation leads to cerebral white matter and retinal damage in the ovine fetus
20011
14 199855
15 199736
16 1997103
17 19961
18 19911
19 198848
20 198838

About Sandra Rees

Sandra Rees is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 142 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (65 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (37 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (28 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (24 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (20 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (12 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (3.1k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (512 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (810 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (639 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (253 citations). Sandra Rees has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Harding, Terrie E. Inder, Michelle Loeliger, Megan L. Cock, Sandra Dieni, Carina Mallard, Mary Tolcos, Jhodie R. Duncan, Terence J. O’Brien and David Copolov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, Pediatric Research, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, Brain Research and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026