Sandra Petersen

446 total citations
9 papers, 289 citations indexed

About

Sandra Petersen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra Petersen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 289 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 2 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sandra Petersen's work include Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers). Sandra Petersen is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers). Sandra Petersen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Sandra Petersen's co-authors include Susan M. Houston, Huanying Qin, Michelle Purdom, Barbara K Haas, Patricia A. Kelly, Richard E. Gilder, Gloria Duke, Geoffrey W. Lane, Lillian Hung and Takanori Shibata and has published in prestigious journals such as Sustainability, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Oncology nursing forum.

In The Last Decade

Sandra Petersen

8 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sandra Petersen United States	7	91	65	53	51	47	9	289
Andy Au-Yeung Canada	5	111 1.2×	66 1.0×	20 0.4×	58 1.1×	66 1.4×	5	275
Alda Troncone Italy	13	64 0.7×	77 1.2×	39 0.7×	18 0.4×	24 0.5×	43	391
Mario Gregorio Canada	9	135 1.5×	144 2.2×	20 0.4×	96 1.9×	109 2.3×	18	417
Christine Wallsworth Canada	8	122 1.3×	186 2.9×	20 0.4×	102 2.0×	92 2.0×	19	460
Elaine Mordoch Canada	10	175 1.9×	77 1.2×	33 0.6×	44 0.9×	57 1.2×	19	565
Geoffrey W. Lane United States	5	60 0.7×	80 1.2×	10 0.2×	80 1.6×	23 0.5×	7	262
Rianne Jansens Netherlands	6	70 0.8×	18 0.3×	21 0.4×	37 0.7×	14 0.3×	8	283
Pooja M. Desai United States	8	28 0.3×	73 1.1×	11 0.2×	12 0.2×	26 0.6×	15	273
Rozanne Wilson Canada	8	20 0.2×	96 1.5×	9 0.2×	76 1.5×	23 0.5×	24	305
Silviu Matu Romania	11	133 1.5×	40 0.6×	19 0.4×	40 0.8×	5 0.1×	24	511

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Petersen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Petersen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Petersen. The network helps show where Sandra Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Petersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Petersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Petersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Petersen. Sandra Petersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Petersen, Sandra, et al.. (2024). Use of Socially Assistive Robots to Improve Outcomes Among Hospitalized Older Adults With Dementia: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 50(10). 11–16.

2.

Duke, Gloria, et al.. (2023). The effectiveness of microcurrent neurofeedback on depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and quality of life. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 36(2). 100–109. 2 indexed citations

3.

Shibata, Takanori, Lillian Hung, Sandra Petersen, et al.. (2021). PARO as a Biofeedback Medical Device for Mental Health in the COVID-19 Era. Sustainability. 13(20). 11502–11502. 13 indexed citations

4.

Kelly, Patricia A., et al.. (2020). The effect of PARO robotic seals for hospitalized patients with dementia: A feasibility study. Geriatric Nursing. 42(1). 37–45. 26 indexed citations

5.

Purdom, Michelle, Sandra Petersen, & Barbara K Haas. (2017). Results of an Oncology Clinical Trial Nurse Role Delineation Study. Oncology nursing forum. 44(5). 589–595. 17 indexed citations

6.

Petersen, Sandra, et al.. (2016). The Utilization of Robotic Pets in Dementia Care. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 55(2). 569–574. 203 indexed citations

7.

Petersen, Sandra, et al.. (2015). A Power in Clinical Nursing Practice: Concept Analysis on Nursing Intuition.. PubMed. 23(5). 343–9. 11 indexed citations

8.

Duke, Gloria & Sandra Petersen. (2015). Perspectives of Asians living in Texas on pain management in the last days of life. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 21(1). 24–34. 7 indexed citations

9.

Petersen, Sandra, et al.. (2013). Critical thinking at the bedside: providing safe passage to patients.. PubMed. 22(2). 85–93, 118. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact