Samuel Tomczyk

1.6k total citations
72 papers, 973 citations indexed

About

Samuel Tomczyk is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Samuel Tomczyk has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 973 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Clinical Psychology, 30 papers in Social Psychology and 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Samuel Tomczyk's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (18 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers). Samuel Tomczyk is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (18 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers). Samuel Tomczyk collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Austria. Samuel Tomczyk's co-authors include Silke Schmidt, Reiner Hanewinkel, Barbara Isensee, Holger Muehlan, Georg Schomerus, Susanne Stolzenburg, Anya Pedersen, Sven Speerforck, Christian Sander and Stephanie Schindler and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, Psychological Medicine and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Samuel Tomczyk

61 papers receiving 953 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Samuel Tomczyk Germany 17 410 288 220 199 188 72 973
Laura Robinson Australia 17 226 0.6× 157 0.5× 285 1.3× 152 0.8× 200 1.1× 69 994
Nicholas Carson United States 19 521 1.3× 312 1.1× 348 1.6× 128 0.6× 265 1.4× 50 1.2k
Abby L. Braitman United States 21 506 1.2× 325 1.1× 256 1.2× 324 1.6× 232 1.2× 94 1.2k
Oľga Orosová Slovakia 20 387 0.9× 223 0.8× 337 1.5× 169 0.8× 151 0.8× 75 1.0k
Joy Gabrielli United States 21 561 1.4× 138 0.5× 232 1.1× 203 1.0× 239 1.3× 61 1.3k
Tracy R. Nichols United States 23 482 1.2× 245 0.9× 498 2.3× 249 1.3× 277 1.5× 61 1.4k
Ferdinand Salonna Slovakia 17 323 0.8× 208 0.7× 473 2.1× 135 0.7× 112 0.6× 66 1.1k
Inmaculada Sánchez‐Queija Spain 19 461 1.1× 366 1.3× 182 0.8× 86 0.4× 169 0.9× 60 935
Daniel R. Hale United Kingdom 14 424 1.0× 196 0.7× 288 1.3× 64 0.3× 136 0.7× 18 1.1k
Ramdas Ransing India 18 717 1.7× 270 0.9× 208 0.9× 67 0.3× 184 1.0× 93 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Tomczyk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Tomczyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Tomczyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Tomczyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Tomczyk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Tomczyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Tomczyk. The network helps show where Samuel Tomczyk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samuel Tomczyk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samuel Tomczyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samuel Tomczyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Samuel Tomczyk. Samuel Tomczyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schulz, P., et al.. (2025). Psychometric properties of the German version of the moral disengagement in meat questionnaire (MDMQ-G). Food Quality and Preference. 127. 105439–105439. 1 indexed citations
2.
Tomczyk, Samuel, et al.. (2025). How exogenous shocks may shape regional quality of life: a dynamic perspective on migration determinants during the Covid-19 pandemic. Review of Regional Research. 45(3). 505–537. 1 indexed citations
3.
Tomczyk, Samuel, et al.. (2025). The issue of overload: A mixed methods analysis of activity-related stress and the use of mental health and psychosocial support by spontaneous volunteers during the 2021 flood in Germany. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 124. 105534–105534. 1 indexed citations
4.
Muehlan, Holger, et al.. (2025). Embracing change: Navigating menopause with the help of mobile health apps in Germany. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology. 24. 100320–100320.
5.
Steyrl, David, et al.. (2024). The help-seeking process and predictors of mental health care use among individuals with depressive symptoms: a machine learning approach. Frontiers in Public Health. 12. 1504720–1504720. 1 indexed citations
6.
Schulz, P., et al.. (2024). Gender and Socioeconomic Influences on Ten Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions: A German Comparative Study. Sustainability. 16(7). 2816–2816. 6 indexed citations
9.
Tomczyk, Samuel, et al.. (2023). Yes, I can! Development and validation of the self-efficacy for self-help scale. Journal of Affective Disorders. 331. 279–286. 3 indexed citations
10.
Tomczyk, Samuel, et al.. (2023). The Seeking Mental Health Care model: prediction of help-seeking for depressive symptoms by stigma and mental illness representations. BMC Public Health. 23(1). 69–69. 33 indexed citations
12.
Tomczyk, Samuel, et al.. (2022). Continuum beliefs of mental illness: a systematic review of measures. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 58(1). 1–16. 10 indexed citations
13.
Schindler, Stephanie, Christian Sander, Silke Schmidt, et al.. (2021). Continuum beliefs and mental illness stigma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation and intervention studies. Psychological Medicine. 51(5). 716–726. 82 indexed citations
15.
Schomerus, Georg, Holger Muehlan, Charlotte Auer, et al.. (2019). Validity and psychometric properties of the Self-Identification as Having a Mental Illness Scale (SELF-I) among currently untreated persons with mental health problems. Psychiatry Research. 273. 303–308. 14 indexed citations
16.
Stolzenburg, Susanne, et al.. (2019). Self-labeling as having a mental or physical illness: the effects of stigma and implications for help-seeking. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 55(7). 907–916. 22 indexed citations
17.
Tomczyk, Samuel, Silke Schmidt, Holger Muehlan, Susanne Stolzenburg, & Georg Schomerus. (2019). A Prospective Study on Structural and Attitudinal Barriers to Professional Help-Seeking for Currently Untreated Mental Health Problems in the Community. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 47(1). 54–69. 29 indexed citations
18.
Tomczyk, Samuel, Holger Muehlan, Simone Freitag, et al.. (2018). Is knowledge “half the battle”? The role of depression literacy in help-seeking among a non-clinical sample of adults with currently untreated mental health problems. Journal of Affective Disorders. 238. 289–296. 30 indexed citations
19.
Tomczyk, Samuel, Anya Pedersen, Reiner Hanewinkel, Barbara Isensee, & Matthis Morgenstern. (2016). Polysubstance use patterns and trajectories in vocational students — A latent transition analysis. Addictive Behaviors. 58. 136–141. 26 indexed citations
20.
Tomczyk, Samuel, Reiner Hanewinkel, & Barbara Isensee. (2015). ‘Klar bleiben’: a school-based alcohol prevention programme for German adolescents—study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 5(11). e010141–e010141. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026