Samuel Thomas

20 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Samuel Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Biological Psychiatry 55
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 31
  • Microbiology 45
  • Aging 11
  • Urology 38
Replace Г. В. Шмарина with:
Г. В. Шмарина Russia
Maryam Rafie‐Kolpin United States
H. M. Beier Germany
Alyssa Baccarella United States
WY Almawi Tunisia
Joseph Taylor United Kingdom
T Oku Japan
E.G. Lo Turco Brazil
Yanjuan Jia China
Heather E. Lynch United States
Samuel Thomas relative to Г. В. Шмарина Russia Г. В. Шмарина's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Г. В. Шмарина · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Thomas. The network helps show where Samuel Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Samuel Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samuel Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Samuel Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1993127
2 2015105
3 199744
4 201930
5 199622
6 199321
7 199513
8
In utero and lactational 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure exacerbates urinary dysfunction in hormone-treated C57BL/6J mice through a non-malignant mechanism involving proteomic changes in the prostate that differ from those elicited by testosterone and estradiol.
202010
9 201910
10 20219
11 20239
12 20209
13 20186
14 19874
15 20204
16 20233
17
[The practice guideline 'Lower urinary-tract symptoms in middle-aged and elderly men' (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].
20053
18 19882
19 19862
20 20221

About Samuel Thomas

Samuel Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Urology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Genetics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (2 papers) and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (55 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (31 citations), Microbiology (45 citations), Aging (11 citations) and Urology (38 citations). Samuel Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William A. Ricke, Lingjun Li, Asit B. Mukherjee, Ling Hao, Gen‐Sheng Feng, Curtis R. Brandt, G I Byrne, Michael W. Taylor, Joseph M. Carlin and Charles S. Schobert. Their work appears in journals such as Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, iScience, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Aging and Journal of Proteome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact