Sam Nixon
About
In The Last Decade
Sam Nixon
9 papers receiving 120 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Anthropology 73
- Archeology 28
- Sociology and Political Science 27
- Paleontology 23
- Archeology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Sam Nixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Nixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Nixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Nixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Nixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Nixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Nixon. The network helps show where Sam Nixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Nixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Nixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Nixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Nixon. Sam Nixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | Miscanthus, short-rotation coppice and the historic environment | 13 |
| 9 | 42 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.