Sam D. Gill
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Health
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Åke HultkrantzChristopher VecseyRaymond J. DeMallieLaurence Armand FrenchHertha D. Sweet WongCurtis M. Hinsley
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers)Study and Philosophy of Religion (6 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers)
- Cited by
- ArcheologyAnthropologyPhilosophy
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal for the Scientific Study of ReligionJournal of American History
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Sam D. Gill
36 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sociology and Political Science 156
- Philosophy 72
- Anthropology 71
- Health 41
- General Health Professions 39
Countries citing papers authored by Sam D. Gill
This map shows the geographic impact of Sam D. Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam D. Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam D. Gill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sam D. Gill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam D. Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam D. Gill. The network helps show where Sam D. Gill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam D. Gill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam D. Gill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam D. Gill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam D. Gill. Sam D. Gill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Storytracking: Texts, Stories, and Histories in Central Australia | 14 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | Native American religious action : a performance approach to religion | 16 |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | Beyond the Primitive: The Religions of Nonliterate Peoples | 10 |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | A theory of Navajo prayer acts : a study of ritual symbolism | 3 |
About Sam D. Gill
Sam D. Gill is a scholar working on Philosophy, Geography, Planning and Development and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 39 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (6 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (13 citations), Anthropology (71 citations) and Philosophy (72 citations). Sam D. Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Åke Hultkrantz, Christopher Vecsey, Raymond J. DeMallie, Laurence Armand French, Hertha D. Sweet Wong and Curtis M. Hinsley. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.