Sakshi Mehta
- Materials Chemistry
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Abhishake MondalSujit KamilyaSubrata GhoshMathieu RouzièresRadovan HerchelYanling LiRodrigue LescouëzecPierre Dechambenoit
- Topics
- Magnetism in coordination complexes (23 papers)Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (19 papers)Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Sakshi Mehta
37 papers receiving 464 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Materials Chemistry 335
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 314
- Inorganic Chemistry 125
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 70
- Organic Chemistry 69
Countries citing papers authored by Sakshi Mehta
This map shows the geographic impact of Sakshi Mehta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sakshi Mehta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sakshi Mehta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sakshi Mehta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sakshi Mehta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sakshi Mehta. The network helps show where Sakshi Mehta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sakshi Mehta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sakshi Mehta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sakshi Mehta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sakshi Mehta. Sakshi Mehta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | Lifestyle-Related Health Behaviors Associated with CardiovascularHealth in Adolescents: A Stairway to Healthy Future | 2 |
| 20 | 20 |
About Sakshi Mehta
Sakshi Mehta is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biophysics and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 40 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (23 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (19 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (314 citations), Biophysics (66 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (125 citations). Sakshi Mehta has collaborated with scholars based in India, Czechia and France. Frequent co-authors include Abhishake Mondal, Sujit Kamilya, Subrata Ghosh, Mathieu Rouzières, Radovan Herchel, Yanling Li, Rodrigue Lescouëzec, Pierre Dechambenoit, Holger Braunschweig and Prince Ravat. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemistry of Materials and Chemical Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.