This map shows the geographic impact of Sai Peck Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sai Peck Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sai Peck Lee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sai Peck Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sai Peck Lee. The network helps show where Sai Peck Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sai Peck Lee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sai Peck Lee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sai Peck Lee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sai Peck Lee. Sai Peck Lee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bandaru, Srinivas, Sai Peck Lee, Kei Yoshitome, et al.. (2020). Structure-based design of gRNA for Cas13. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 11610–11610.42 indexed citations
Lee, Sai Peck, et al.. (2019). Change management framework to support UML diagrams changes.. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 16. 720–730.2 indexed citations
5.
Lee, Sai Peck, et al.. (2017). Change management technique for supporting object oriented diagrams changes.. Computer Systems: Science & Engineering. 32.1 indexed citations
Chong, Chun Yong, Sai Peck Lee, & Teck Chaw Ling. (2014). Prioritizing and fulfilling quality attributes for virtual lab development through application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and software development guidelines. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 27(1). 1–19.10 indexed citations
Chong, Chun Yong, Sai Peck Lee, & Teck Chaw Ling. (2012). Development of virtual lab system through application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. 1. 207–211.1 indexed citations
Ahmad, R. Badlishah, et al.. (2012). Impact of CMMI-Based Process Maturity Levels on Effort, Productivity and Diseconomy of Scale. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 9. 352–360.3 indexed citations
14.
Ahmad, R. Badlishah, et al.. (2010). Impact of CMMI-Based Software Process Maturity on COCOMO II s Effort Estimation. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 7. 129–137.13 indexed citations
15.
Lee, Sai Peck, et al.. (2006). Alternative Learning Approaches for Electronic Learning Environments in Smart Schools: Survey Results.. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 3. 144–151.1 indexed citations
16.
Lee, Sai Peck, et al.. (2006). GeneONE Portal Framework for integrating Genome Databases, tools, techniques and methods. 481–484.1 indexed citations
17.
Lee, Sai Peck, et al.. (2006). An Ontology-Based Knowledge Model for Software Experience Management. The International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management. 14(3). 79–88.13 indexed citations
18.
Lee, Sai Peck, et al.. (2005). LiSER: a software experience management tool to support organisational learning in software development organisations. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 2. 10–16.
Lee, Sai Peck, et al.. (1999). An Approach To The Development of Hybrid Object-Oriented Design Tool. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 12(1). 47–54.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.