Saffire S.K.S. Phoa
- Hepatology top 5%
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis 9
- Oncology top 5%
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 11
- Surgery top 5%
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 9
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment 4
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 5
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment 4
-
- MRI in cancer diagnosis 3
-
- Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases 4
- Co-authors
- Thomas M. van GulikDirk J. GoumaJaap StokerJoanne VerheijPatrick M. BossuytMatthanja BiezeOtto M. van DeldenShandra Bipat
- Cited by
- HepatologyOncologySurgery
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Saffire S.K.S. Phoa
43 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Hepatology 289
- Oncology 526
- Surgery 605
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 416
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 221
Countries citing papers authored by Saffire S.K.S. Phoa
This map shows the geographic impact of Saffire S.K.S. Phoa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saffire S.K.S. Phoa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saffire S.K.S. Phoa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Saffire S.K.S. Phoa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saffire S.K.S. Phoa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saffire S.K.S. Phoa. The network helps show where Saffire S.K.S. Phoa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Saffire S.K.S. Phoa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 55 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 182 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 8 |
About Saffire S.K.S. Phoa
Saffire S.K.S. Phoa is a scholar working on Hepatology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (11 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (9 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (9 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (5 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (4 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (4 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (4 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (289 citations), Oncology (526 citations), Surgery (605 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (416 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (221 citations). Saffire S.K.S. Phoa has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. van Gulik, Dirk J. Gouma, Jaap Stoker, Joanne Verheij, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Matthanja Bieze, Otto M. van Delden, Shandra Bipat, Jacomina W. van den Esschert and Johan S. Laméris. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, HPB, Digestive Surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.