Saad Shafqat
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Neurology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Yuchiao ChangKaren L. FurieJoel SteinMary GuanciLee H. SchwammJoseph C. KvedarPeter J. KellyJohn W. Henson
- Topics
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (8 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- PakistanUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Saad Shafqat
24 papers receiving 634 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Epidemiology 311
- Rehabilitation 266
- Neurology 157
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 121
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 92
Countries citing papers authored by Saad Shafqat
This map shows the geographic impact of Saad Shafqat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saad Shafqat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saad Shafqat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Saad Shafqat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saad Shafqat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saad Shafqat. The network helps show where Saad Shafqat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Saad Shafqat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Saad Shafqat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Saad Shafqat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Saad Shafqat. Saad Shafqat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Clinical practice guidelines for the management of ischemic stroke in Pakistan. | 12 |
| 12 | 166 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Functional recovery in brain hemorrhage versus infarction: distinct trajectories of cognitive and motor recovery during inpatient rehabilitation | 1 |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 166 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Saad Shafqat
Saad Shafqat is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology and Internal Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (266 citations), Internal Medicine (41 citations) and Neurology (157 citations). Saad Shafqat has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Yuchiao Chang, Karen L. Furie, Joel Stein, Mary Guanci, Lee H. Schwamm, Joseph C. Kvedar, Peter J. Kelly, John W. Henson, Danish Saleheen and Syed S.I. Bukhari. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.