S.A. Missmer

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

S.A. Missmer is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, S.A. Missmer has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in S.A. Missmer's work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). S.A. Missmer is often cited by papers focused on Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). S.A. Missmer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Netherlands. S.A. Missmer's co-authors include Leslie V. Farland, Amy L. Shafrir, Krina T. Zondervan, Marina Kvaskoff, Katharine F. Correia, Allison F. Vitonis, Geraldine Skurnik, Jennifer Stuart, EB Rimm and Julie Horn and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

S.A. Missmer

8 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical ep... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S.A. Missmer United States 5 1.1k 835 339 202 57 9 1.2k
Thomas Faustmann Germany 17 1.2k 1.1× 1.0k 1.2× 203 0.6× 442 2.2× 37 0.6× 30 1.3k
Rafet Gazvani United Kingdom 12 606 0.6× 419 0.5× 347 1.0× 146 0.7× 47 0.8× 26 716
Maria Pina Frattaruolo Italy 23 1.5k 1.4× 1.2k 1.5× 323 1.0× 361 1.8× 33 0.6× 37 1.6k
Giorgio Aimi Italy 15 1.5k 1.4× 1.2k 1.5× 230 0.7× 350 1.7× 54 0.9× 22 1.6k
Maurizio Nicola D’Alterio Italy 19 627 0.6× 506 0.6× 162 0.5× 129 0.6× 33 0.6× 49 826
B. De Bie Netherlands 6 1.7k 1.6× 1.4k 1.6× 337 1.0× 425 2.1× 32 0.6× 11 1.9k
Olga Bougie Canada 15 589 0.5× 517 0.6× 151 0.4× 131 0.6× 33 0.6× 67 818
Lucia Lazzeri Italy 24 1.8k 1.7× 1.5k 1.8× 333 1.0× 347 1.7× 43 0.8× 91 1.9k
A. Nap Netherlands 3 1.6k 1.5× 1.3k 1.5× 327 1.0× 284 1.4× 18 0.3× 4 1.6k
Saeed Alborzi Iran 24 1.3k 1.2× 1.1k 1.3× 221 0.7× 451 2.2× 148 2.6× 76 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by S.A. Missmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.A. Missmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.A. Missmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.A. Missmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.A. Missmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.A. Missmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.A. Missmer. The network helps show where S.A. Missmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.A. Missmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.A. Missmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.A. Missmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.A. Missmer. S.A. Missmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Shafrir, Amy L., et al.. (2018). Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 51. 1–15. 528 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Horn, Julie, et al.. (2018). Early or late pregnancy loss and development of clinical cardiovascular disease risk factors: a prospective cohort study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 126(1). 33–42. 46 indexed citations
3.
Brady, Paula C., S.A. Missmer, & Marc R. Laufer. (2016). Bladder Involvement in Stage I Endometriosis. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 29(2). 184–185.
4.
Missmer, S.A., et al.. (2016). Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 23(7). S8–S9. 2 indexed citations
5.
Correia, Katharine F., et al.. (2013). Body size and endometriosis: results from 20 years of follow-up within the Nurses' Health Study II prospective cohort. Human Reproduction. 28(7). 1783–1792. 128 indexed citations
6.
Correia, Katharine F., et al.. (2013). Uterine length and fertility outcomes: a cohort study in the IVF population. Human Reproduction. 28(11). 3000–3006. 18 indexed citations
7.
Rossi, Brooke V., et al.. (2010). In vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes and alcohol consumption in risk drinkers: effects of a randomized intervention. Fertility and Sterility. 94(4). S224–S224. 1 indexed citations
8.
Doyle, Joseph, et al.. (2007). MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation (MRgFUS) of uterine fibroids: clinical predictors of successful outcome at three years. Fertility and Sterility. 88. S82–S82. 2 indexed citations
9.
Missmer, S.A.. (2004). Incidence of Laparoscopically Confirmed Endometriosis by Demographic, Anthropometric, and Lifestyle Factors. American Journal of Epidemiology. 160(8). 784–796. 448 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026