S. Woolmore-Goodwin

6 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

S. Woolmore-Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 182
  • Developmental Neuroscience 115
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 120
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 38
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
Replace Annemarieke de Jonghe with:
Annemarieke de Jonghe Netherlands
Martin G. Kat Netherlands
Ting‐Jhen Chen Taiwan
Vasco Nogueira Portugal
C. Hein France
Edmund Lonergan United States
Linnea Vaurio United States
Kathleen Franco United States
Saho Wada Japan
Samir Tulebaev United States
S. Woolmore-Goodwin relative to Annemarieke de Jonghe Netherlands Annemarieke de Jonghe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Annemarieke de Jonghe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Woolmore-Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Woolmore-Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Woolmore-Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Woolmore-Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Woolmore-Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Woolmore-Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Woolmore-Goodwin. The network helps show where S. Woolmore-Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Woolmore-Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Woolmore-Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together S. Woolmore-Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2010207
2 201350
3 201249
4 201524
5 20145
6 20154

About S. Woolmore-Goodwin

S. Woolmore-Goodwin is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Occupational Therapy and Pharmacology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper), Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (182 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (115 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (120 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (38 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations). S. Woolmore-Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Iris Gutmanis, Jacquelin Esbaugh, Christopher D. Brymer, Tareef Alaama, Monidipa Dasgupta, Michael Borrie, Jennie Wells, Jennifer Fogarty, Kevin T. Hansen and Pamela Jarrett. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Geriatrics Journal, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders and American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias®.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact