S Solve

532 total citations
73 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

S Solve is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, S Solve has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 67 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 50 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 29 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in S Solve's work include Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (67 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (50 papers) and Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (29 papers). S Solve is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (67 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (50 papers) and Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (29 papers). S Solve collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and South Korea. S Solve's co-authors include M Stöck, Barry Wood, Alain Rüfenacht, E. de Mirandes, H. Fang, A. Kiss, Samuel P. Benz, Charles J. Burroughs, Mun-Seog Kim and Yi-hua Tang and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Measurement Science and Technology and Metrologia.

In The Last Decade

S Solve

63 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
S Solve France	10	264	220	83	68	44	73	346
Dean G. Jarrett United States	11	334 1.3×	112 0.5×	19 0.2×	171 2.5×	135 3.1×	73	455
C A Sánchez Canada	8	76 0.3×	194 0.9×	119 1.4×	34 0.5×	63 1.4×	20	273
Ilya Budovsky Australia	14	513 1.9×	137 0.6×	7 0.1×	49 0.7×	157 3.6×	67	535
I. Busch Germany	7	30 0.1×	171 0.8×	143 1.7×	15 0.2×	42 1.0×	16	244
W Giardini Australia	10	25 0.1×	223 1.0×	95 1.1×	33 0.5×	55 1.3×	21	310
M. Zeier Switzerland	12	241 0.9×	14 0.1×	9 0.1×	58 0.9×	17 0.4×	37	335
G. Ramm Germany	11	493 1.9×	103 0.5×	2 0.0×	36 0.5×	114 2.6×	24	508
H.P. Chou Taiwan	9	162 0.6×	6 0.0×	50 0.6×	30 0.4×	15 0.3×	37	249
Harald Moser Germany	10	422 1.6×	92 0.4×	1 0.0×	33 0.5×	105 2.4×	22	439
Won-Kyu Lee South Korea	14	190 0.7×	49 0.2×	7 0.1×	422 6.2×	7 0.2×	44	474

Countries citing papers authored by S Solve

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S Solve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S Solve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S Solve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S Solve

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S Solve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S Solve. The network helps show where S Solve may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S Solve

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S Solve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S Solve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S Solve. S Solve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Solve, S, et al.. (2024). Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between INRIM (Italy) and the BIPM, November to December 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b). Metrologia. 61(1A). 1004–1004.

Solve, S, et al.. (2024). Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between SASO-NMCC (Saudi Arabia) and the BIPM, September to November 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b). Metrologia. 61(1A). 1005–1005.

Kim, Mun-Seog, et al.. (2024). Impact of Sampler Characteristics in a PJVS-Based Differential Sampling: A Comparative Analysis of Measurements Using Fluke 8588A and NI PXI-5922. 1–2.

Solve, S, et al.. (2023). Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between CSIR-NPL (India) and the BIPM, April to June 2022 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b). Metrologia. 60(1A). 1009–1009. 1 indexed citations

Solve, S, et al.. (2022). Bilateral Comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V Standards between the SMD (Belgium) and the BIPM, October to December 2021 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11). Metrologia. 59(1A). 1005–1005. 1 indexed citations

Solve, S, et al.. (2021). Comparison of the Josephson voltage standards of the MIKES and the BIPM. Metrologia. 58(1A). 1007–1007. 1 indexed citations

Solve, S, et al.. (2021). Bilateral comparison of 10 V standards between the NSAI-NML (Ireland) and the BIPM. Metrologia. 58(1A). 1006–1006.

Solve, S, et al.. (2021). Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between the BIM (Bulgaria) and the BIPM (BIPM.EM-K11.a and b). Metrologia. 58(1A). 1005–1005. 1 indexed citations

Yang, Shiwen, et al.. (2021). Metrology of Zener-based secondary voltage standards. Measurement Science and Technology. 32(10). 105019–105019. 3 indexed citations

10.

Kim, Mun-Seog, et al.. (2020). Measurement configurations for differential sampling of AC waveforms based on a programmable Josephson voltage standard: effects of sampler bandwidth on the measurements. Metrologia. 57(6). 65020–65020. 13 indexed citations

11.

Yang, Steven, et al.. (2020). GULFMET key comparison of DC voltage at 1.018 V and 10 V. Metrologia. 57(1A). 1012–1012. 1 indexed citations

12.

Solve, S, et al.. (2018). Bilateral comparison of 1 V and 10 V standards between the NMISA (South Africa) and the BIPM April to June 2017 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b). Metrologia. 55(1A). 1001–1001. 2 indexed citations

13.

Yang, Steven, et al.. (2018). Determination of Pressure Coefficients for the Transport Standards of GULFMET DC Voltage Inter-Laboratory Comparison. 1–2. 1 indexed citations

14.

Solve, S, et al.. (2016). Temperature sensitivity coefficients of the BIPM secondary voltage standards. 1–2. 3 indexed citations

15.

Solve, S, et al.. (2015). Comparison of the Josephson Voltage Standards of the PTB and the BIPM (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K10.b). Metrologia. 52(1A). 1025–1025. 2 indexed citations

16.

Solve, S, et al.. (2014). Investigations on the measurement of the leakage resistance to ground of a NIST Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard. 2 indexed citations

17.

Solve, S, et al.. (2012). Key comparisons of the VNIIM and BIPM voltage standards. Measurement Techniques. 54(11). 1313–1318. 3 indexed citations

18.

Solve, S, et al.. (2012). Comparison of the Josephson voltage standards of the INTI and the BIPM (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K10.a). Metrologia. 49(1A). 1009–1009. 1 indexed citations

19.

Mirandes, E. de, H. Fang, A. Kiss, et al.. (2011). Alignment Procedure Used in the BIPM Watt Balance. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 60(7). 2415–2421. 10 indexed citations

20.

Solve, S, et al.. (2009). Comparison of the Josephson voltage standards of the LNE and the BIPM (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K10.b). Metrologia. 46(1A). 1002–1002. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact