Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effect of temperature and light on the growth of algae species: A review
2015683 citationsS. P. Singh et al.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of S. P. Singh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. P. Singh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. P. Singh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. P. Singh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. P. Singh. The network helps show where S. P. Singh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. P. Singh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. P. Singh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. P. Singh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. P. Singh. S. P. Singh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Singh, S. P., et al.. (2013). Solar Passive Features of the Heritage Building: the Case of the Gohar Mahal, Bhopal. Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform). 3(6). 14–23.3 indexed citations
Paul, Biplab, et al.. (2013). Design, Development And Performance Evaluation Of Solar Dryer With Mirror Booster For Red Chilli (Capsicum Annum).2 indexed citations
Saxena, Shruti & S. P. Singh. (2011). Effectiveness of Syzygium cumini on reproductive organs of albino rats against silica induced toxicity.. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY INDIA. 14(2). 643–649.
Singh, S. P., et al.. (2010). Biological activities of Aloe vera.. Journal of Pharmacy Technology. 2(3). 259–280.8 indexed citations
10.
Prakash, Atul, et al.. (2009). IMPACT OF LEAD ON CLINICOHEMATOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AFTER DIETARY ORAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF TULSI (OCIMUM SANCTUM) IN COCKERELS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(3). 173–177.1 indexed citations
11.
Mehta, Gaurav, et al.. (2006). Clinicohaematological alterations in buffalo due to chlorpyrifos dermal toxicity.. Veterinary Practitioner. 7(1). 7–9.1 indexed citations
12.
Patra, D. D., et al.. (2005). Agrotechnologies of senna (Cassia angustifolia). Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences. 27(1). 101–105.1 indexed citations
13.
Singh, Yadvinder, et al.. (2002). Effect of rice (Oryza sativa)-establishment methods, tillage practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and fertilization on soil physical properties and rice-wheat system productivity on a silty day Mollisol of Uttaranchal. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 72(4). 200–205.20 indexed citations
14.
Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar, et al.. (2002). On-Farm Evaluation of Different Herbicides for Efficient Weed Control in Zero-Till Sown Wheat in Rice-Wheat Cropping System. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 34. 121–122.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.