S. P. Foster

1.2k citations
42 papers · 989 indexed · h-index 17

S. P. Foster

41 papers receiving 952 citations

Peers

S. P. Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Insect Science 835
  • Molecular Biology 318
  • Plant Science 318
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 298
  • Genetics 206
Replace Lin‐Quan Ge with:
Lin‐Quan Ge China
G. W. Elzen United States
K. S. Boo South Korea
G. C. Rock United States
G. Bonnot France
Zhengqiang Peng China
M. S. Mayer United States
Vicente Navarro‐Llopis Spain
R. L. Hale United States
Erma S. Vanderzant United States
S. P. Foster relative to Lin‐Quan Ge China Lin‐Quan Ge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Lin‐Quan Ge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. P. Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. P. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. P. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. P. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. P. Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. P. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. P. Foster. The network helps show where S. P. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. P. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. P. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. P. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. P. Foster. S. P. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 28
2
Aphids galore! So how did the industry avert a virus yellows epidemic in 2007?
1
3 73
4 41
5
Insecticide resistance to aphids
0
6 104
7
Resistance to carbamate, organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides in the potato aphid (Macrosiphum euphorbiae).
3
8
Is the Number of Hands Relative to Leaf Number Important?
1
9 15
10 13
11
Resistance in Myzus persicae : current status in Europe and future prospects
2
12 41
13 27
14 8
15 12
16 29
17 32
18 16
19 25
20 18

About S. P. Foster

S. P. Foster is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 989 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pheromone Research and Control (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (835 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (298 citations) and Plant Science (318 citations). S. P. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin S. Williamson, I. Denholm, Wendell L. Roelofs, A. L. Devonshire, L. M. Field, G. D. Moores, R. L. Blackman, M. O. Harris, Ioannis Eleftherianos and Albert Howard. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Heredity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026