S. Menmuir

2.8k total citations
57 papers, 525 citations indexed

About

S. Menmuir is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Menmuir has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 525 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 22 papers in Materials Chemistry and 14 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in S. Menmuir's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (51 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (22 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (14 papers). S. Menmuir is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (51 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (22 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (14 papers). S. Menmuir collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Sweden. S. Menmuir's co-authors include J. R. Drake, L. Frassinetti, C. Giroud, M. Cecconello, P.R. Brunsell, E. Rachlew, E. Delabie, P. R. Brunsell, M. Sertoli and M. Groth and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physics of Plasmas.

In The Last Decade

S. Menmuir

48 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Menmuir United Kingdom 16 487 226 202 134 111 57 525
the TCV Team Switzerland 16 547 1.1× 260 1.2× 254 1.3× 105 0.8× 124 1.1× 35 578
B.D. Bray United States 13 486 1.0× 341 1.5× 147 0.7× 127 0.9× 67 0.6× 34 541
A. Patel United Kingdom 13 502 1.0× 166 0.7× 250 1.2× 142 1.1× 149 1.3× 28 544
István Pusztai Sweden 13 431 0.9× 207 0.9× 200 1.0× 77 0.6× 83 0.7× 48 463
S. K. Rathgeber Germany 13 682 1.4× 381 1.7× 332 1.6× 199 1.5× 170 1.5× 30 731
S. Sudo Japan 12 458 0.9× 201 0.9× 207 1.0× 88 0.7× 125 1.1× 38 510
P. B. Parks United States 14 501 1.0× 218 1.0× 192 1.0× 130 1.0× 96 0.9× 34 551
R. Wunderlich Germany 9 481 1.0× 344 1.5× 144 0.7× 121 0.9× 89 0.8× 21 520
A. Lebschy Germany 12 438 0.9× 191 0.8× 228 1.1× 110 0.8× 112 1.0× 18 457
J. Boom Germany 16 634 1.3× 199 0.9× 363 1.8× 137 1.0× 156 1.4× 38 673

Countries citing papers authored by S. Menmuir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Menmuir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Menmuir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Menmuir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Menmuir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Menmuir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Menmuir. The network helps show where S. Menmuir may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Menmuir

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Menmuir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Menmuir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Menmuir. S. Menmuir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mäenpää, R., H. Kumpulainen, M. Groth, et al.. (2025). Impact of nitrogen molecular breakup on divertor conditions in JET L-mode plasmas using SOLPS-ITER. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 43. 101929–101929.
2.
Faitsch, M., M. Dunne, E. Lerche, et al.. (2025). The quasi-continuous exhaust regime in JET. Nuclear Fusion. 65(2). 24003–24003. 3 indexed citations
3.
Delabie, E., M. O’Mullane, M. von Hellermann, et al.. (2024). The CXSFIT spectral fitting code: Past, present and future. Review of Scientific Instruments. 95(8). 1 indexed citations
4.
Lawson, K., et al.. (2024). He II line intensity measurements in the JET tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 66(11). 115001–115001. 1 indexed citations
5.
Garzotti, L., C. Bourdelle, F. J. Casson, et al.. (2023). Neon seeding effects on two high-performance baseline plasmas on the Joint European Torus. Nuclear Fusion. 63(8). 86025–86025. 5 indexed citations
6.
Horsten, N., M. Groth, W. Dekeyser, et al.. (2022). Validation of SOLPS-ITER simulations with kinetic, fluid, and hybrid neutral models for JET-ILW low-confinement mode plasmas. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 33. 101247–101247. 8 indexed citations
7.
Thorman, A., E. Litherland–Smith, S. Menmuir, et al.. (2021). Visible spectroscopy of highly charged tungsten ions with the JET charge exchange diagnostic. Physica Scripta. 96(12). 125631–125631. 8 indexed citations
8.
Lomanowski, B., et al.. (2020). Interpretation of Lyman opacity measurements in JET with the ITER-like wall using a particle balance approach. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 62(6). 65006–65006. 21 indexed citations
9.
Lomanowski, B., A. Thorman, S. Menmuir, et al.. (2019). Main ion charge exchange spectroscopy on JET in preparation for the DT campaign. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2019. 1 indexed citations
10.
Weisen, H., E. Delabie, J. Flanagan, et al.. (2019). Analysis of the inter-species power balance in JET plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 60(3). 36004–36004. 11 indexed citations
11.
Maggi, C. F., F. J. Casson, F. Auriemma, et al.. (2019). Isotope identity experiments in JET-ILW with H and D L-mode plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 59(7). 76028–76028. 22 indexed citations
12.
Hawkes, N. C., E. Delabie, S. Menmuir, et al.. (2018). Instrumentation for the upgrade to the JET core charge-exchange spectrometers. Review of Scientific Instruments. 89(10). 10D113–10D113. 15 indexed citations
13.
Sertoli, M., J. Flanagan, M. Maslov, et al.. (2018). Determination of 2D poloidal maps of the intrinsic W density for transport studies in JET-ILW. Review of Scientific Instruments. 89(11). 113501–113501. 15 indexed citations
14.
Delabie, E., M. F. F. Nave, M. Baruzzo, et al.. (2017). Preliminary interpretation of the isotope effect on energy confinement in Ohmic discharges in JET-ILW. Max Planck Digital Library. 3 indexed citations
15.
Lawson, K., M. Groth, D. Harting, et al.. (2017). A study of the atomic and molecular power loss terms in EDGE2D-EIRENE simulations of JET ITER-like wall L-mode discharges. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 12. 924–930. 1 indexed citations
16.
Frassinetti, L., Youwen Sun, R. Fridström, et al.. (2015). Braking due to non-resonant magnetic perturbations and comparison with neoclassical toroidal viscosity torque in EXTRAP T2R. Nuclear Fusion. 55(11). 112003–112003. 15 indexed citations
17.
Menmuir, S., L. Carraro, A. Alfier, et al.. (2010). Impurity transport studies in RFX-mod multiple helicity and enhanced confinement QSH regimes. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 52(9). 95001–95001. 18 indexed citations
18.
Bergsåker, H., S. Menmuir, E. Rachlew, et al.. (2008). Metal impurity fluxes and plasma-surface interactions in EXTRAP T2R. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 100(6). 62030–62030. 4 indexed citations
19.
Menmuir, S., E. Rachlew, U. Fantz, R. Pugno, & R. Dux. (2006). Molecular contribution to the Dα emission in the divertor of the ASDEX Upgrade experiment. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer. 105(3). 425–437. 6 indexed citations
20.
Drake, J. R., P.R. Brunsell, H. Bergsåker, et al.. (2006). Experiments on feedback control of multiple resistive wall modes comparing different active coil arrays and sensor types.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by the TCV Team Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B.D. Bray Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Patel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by István Pusztai Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. K. Rathgeber Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Sudo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. B. Parks Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Wunderlich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Lebschy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Boom
Rankless by CCL
2026