P. Böhm

1.4k total citations
38 papers, 277 citations indexed

About

P. Böhm is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, P. Böhm has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 277 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 17 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 13 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in P. Böhm's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (31 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (17 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (11 papers). P. Böhm is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (31 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (17 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (11 papers). P. Böhm collaborates with scholars based in Czechia, United Kingdom and France. P. Böhm's co-authors include P. Bílková, R. Pánek, R. Scannell, M. Aftanas, V. Weinzettl, M. Hron, J. Ştöckel, D. Šesták, J. Horáček and Jiřı́ Adámek and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Nuclear Fusion.

In The Last Decade

P. Böhm

36 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
P. Böhm Czechia 10 231 104 91 76 70 38 277
C. Mazzotta Italy 11 239 1.0× 102 1.0× 144 1.6× 84 1.1× 88 1.3× 39 353
M. F. M. de Bock Netherlands 10 326 1.4× 222 2.1× 58 0.6× 70 0.9× 38 0.5× 20 357
J. Havlíček Czechia 11 295 1.3× 104 1.0× 117 1.3× 85 1.1× 52 0.7× 51 336
Y. Andrèbe Switzerland 12 255 1.1× 87 0.8× 113 1.2× 58 0.8× 65 0.9× 26 298
J. Seidl Czechia 13 310 1.3× 125 1.2× 131 1.4× 89 1.2× 82 1.2× 41 343
T. O’Gorman United Kingdom 10 252 1.1× 149 1.4× 65 0.7× 52 0.7× 77 1.1× 24 322
A. V. Voronin Russia 9 121 0.5× 49 0.5× 89 1.0× 35 0.5× 52 0.7× 48 223
S. Shibaev United Kingdom 8 262 1.1× 127 1.2× 68 0.7× 56 0.7× 38 0.5× 24 285
T. Stange Germany 11 324 1.4× 106 1.0× 102 1.1× 172 2.3× 126 1.8× 89 438
Y. Turkin Germany 12 476 2.1× 241 2.3× 173 1.9× 130 1.7× 52 0.7× 31 521

Countries citing papers authored by P. Böhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Böhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Böhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Böhm. The network helps show where P. Böhm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Böhm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Böhm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Böhm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. Böhm. P. Böhm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Faitsch, M., M. Dunne, E. Lerche, et al.. (2025). The quasi-continuous exhaust regime in JET. Nuclear Fusion. 65(2). 24003–24003. 3 indexed citations
2.
Komm, M., Jiřı́ Adámek, P. Bílková, et al.. (2023). Experimental evidence of very short power decay lengths in H-mode discharges in the COMPASS tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 66(1). 15013–15013. 4 indexed citations
3.
Saarelma, S., J. W. Connor, P. Bílková, et al.. (2023). Testing a prediction model for the H-mode density pedestal against JET-ILW pedestals. Nuclear Fusion. 63(5). 52002–52002. 4 indexed citations
4.
Grover, O., P. Mänz, A. Yu. Yashin, et al.. (2023). Experimentally corroborated model of pressure relaxation limit cycle oscillations in the vicinity of the transition to high confinement in tokamaks. Nuclear Fusion. 64(2). 26001–26001. 8 indexed citations
5.
Böhm, P., et al.. (2022). Effect of reinforcement parameters on the impact resistance of cementitious composites for vehicle restraint systems. Procedia Structural Integrity. 42. 1382–1390. 1 indexed citations
6.
Tomeš, M., M. Carr, A. Meakins, et al.. (2021). Thomson scattering synthetic diagnostic module for the Cherab framework. Review of Scientific Instruments. 92(5). 53532–53532. 1 indexed citations
7.
Carli, S., W. Dekeyser, R. Dejarnac, et al.. (2020). Interchange‐turbulence‐based radial transport model for SOLPS‐ITER: A COMPASS case study. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 60(5-6). 7 indexed citations
8.
Komm, M., J. Cavalier, Jiřı́ Adámek, et al.. (2020). Power exhaust by core radiation at COMPASS tokamak. Nuclear Fusion. 61(3). 36016–36016. 4 indexed citations
9.
Komm, M., J. Ştöckel, Jiřı́ Adámek, et al.. (2019). On the possiblity of direct electrical power extraction from scrape-off layer currents in tokamaks. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 61(9). 95017–95017. 2 indexed citations
10.
Fassina, A., P. Bílková, P. Böhm, & P. Franz. (2019). Sensitivity of Thomson Scattering Measurements on Electron Distribution Modeling in Low-Density RFP Plasmas. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 47(3). 1605–1610.
11.
Böhm, P., O. Grover, P. Bílková, et al.. (2018). Observation and evaluation of the alignment of Thomson scattering systems. Review of Scientific Instruments. 89(10). 10C105–10C105. 5 indexed citations
12.
Scannell, R., M. Maslov, T. O’Gorman, et al.. (2017). Design advances of the Core Plasma Thomson Scattering diagnostic for ITER. Journal of Instrumentation. 12(11). C11010–C11010. 8 indexed citations
13.
Markovič, T., Y.Q. Liu, P. Cahyna, et al.. (2016). Measurements and modelling of plasma response field to RMP on the COMPASS tokamak. Nuclear Fusion. 56(9). 92010–92010. 6 indexed citations
14.
Hron, M., P. Böhm, G. Naylor, et al.. (2014). Timing and triggering of the Thomson scattering diagnostics on the COMPASS tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design. 89(5). 693–697. 4 indexed citations
15.
Scannell, R., et al.. (2013). Outline of optical design and viewing geometry for divertor Thomson scattering on MAST upgrade. Journal of Instrumentation. 8(11). C11010–C11010. 14 indexed citations
16.
Zając, J., J. Preinhaelter, J. Urbán, et al.. (2012). First results from EBW emission diagnostics on COMPASS. Review of Scientific Instruments. 83(10). 10E327–10E327. 2 indexed citations
17.
Aftanas, M., P. Böhm, P. Bílková, et al.. (2012). High-resolution Thomson scattering system on the COMPASS tokamak: Evaluation of plasma parameters and error analysis. Review of Scientific Instruments. 83(10). 10E350–10E350. 8 indexed citations
18.
Bílková, P., P. Böhm, V. Weinzettl, et al.. (2010). Design of new Thomson scattering diagnostic system on COMPASS tokamak. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 623(2). 656–659. 19 indexed citations
19.
Aftanas, M., R. Scannell, P. Bílková, et al.. (2009). Design of Filters for COMPASS Thomson Scattering Diagnostics. 1 indexed citations
20.
Turčičová, Hana, J. Dostál, J. Skála, et al.. (2005). Solid-state-gas-laser SOFIA as a pump for the optical parametric chirped pulse amplification. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5777. 631–631. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Mazzotta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. F. M. de Bock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Havlíček Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Y. Andrèbe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Seidl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. O’Gorman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. V. Voronin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Shibaev Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Stange Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Y. Turkin
Rankless by CCL
2026