S. M. Hooker

5.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
102 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

S. M. Hooker is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, S. M. Hooker has authored 102 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 72 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 67 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 46 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in S. M. Hooker's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (67 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (66 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (33 papers). S. M. Hooker is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (67 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (66 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (33 papers). S. M. Hooker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. S. M. Hooker's co-authors include David J. Spence, A. J. Gonsalves, C. B. Schroeder, Csaba Tóth, Wim Leemans, K. Nakamura, Bob Nagler, E. Esarey, C. G. R. Geddes and Alison Butler and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Nature Photonics.

In The Last Decade

S. M. Hooker

99 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

GeV electron beams from a... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2009 2008 400 800 1.2k

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
S. M. Hooker 3.4k 2.4k 1.9k 1.1k 498 102 4.0k
K. Nakamura 3.6k 1.1× 2.0k 0.8× 1.8k 0.9× 1.0k 1.0× 631 1.3× 120 4.3k
J. van Tilborg 3.3k 1.0× 2.6k 1.1× 1.8k 0.9× 1.4k 1.3× 579 1.2× 121 4.3k
C. G. R. Geddes 3.0k 0.9× 1.8k 0.8× 1.7k 0.9× 682 0.6× 419 0.8× 47 3.1k
C. Joshi 3.7k 1.1× 2.3k 0.9× 2.2k 1.2× 843 0.8× 356 0.7× 122 4.0k
F. Burgy 3.8k 1.1× 2.7k 1.1× 1.9k 1.0× 767 0.7× 780 1.6× 54 4.3k
F. S. Tsung 4.9k 1.4× 2.9k 1.2× 2.8k 1.5× 898 0.8× 588 1.2× 90 5.1k
J. Vieira 2.8k 0.8× 2.0k 0.8× 1.3k 0.7× 722 0.7× 334 0.7× 113 3.3k
Y. Glinec 2.9k 0.9× 1.8k 0.7× 1.8k 1.0× 457 0.4× 532 1.1× 40 3.2k
E. Lefebvre 5.1k 1.5× 3.2k 1.3× 3.0k 1.6× 710 0.7× 841 1.7× 71 5.4k
K. Ta Phuoc 3.0k 0.9× 1.7k 0.7× 1.3k 0.7× 629 0.6× 944 1.9× 47 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by S. M. Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. M. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. M. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. M. Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. M. Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. M. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. M. Hooker. The network helps show where S. M. Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. M. Hooker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. M. Hooker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. M. Hooker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. M. Hooker. S. M. Hooker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Archer, Emily, Bangshan Sun, R. Walczak, Martin J. Booth, & S. M. Hooker. (2025). On the localization of the high-intensity region of simultaneous space-time foci. Optics Express. 33(4). 7645–7645. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hooker, S. M., et al.. (2024). Multi-GeV wakefield acceleration in a plasma-modulated plasma accelerator. Physical review. E. 109(2). 25206–25206. 4 indexed citations
3.
Chappell, J., Emily Archer, Nicolas Bourgeois, et al.. (2024). Resonant excitation of plasma waves in a plasma channel. Physical Review Research. 6(2). 2 indexed citations
4.
Hooker, S. M., et al.. (2023). Stability of the modulator in a plasma-modulated plasma accelerator. Physical review. E. 108(1). 15204–15204. 3 indexed citations
5.
Boyle, G. J., Á. Ferran Pousa, R. J. Shalloo, et al.. (2023). Demonstration of tunability of HOFI waveguides via start-to-end simulations. Physical Review Research. 5(3). 6 indexed citations
6.
Walczak, R., et al.. (2023). Modulational instability in large-amplitude linear laser wakefields. Physical review. E. 107(2). L023201–L023201. 2 indexed citations
7.
Jonnerby, Jakob, J. Holloway, L. Corner, et al.. (2023). Measurement of the decay of laser-driven linear plasma wakefields. Physical review. E. 108(5). 1 indexed citations
8.
Chappell, J., Emily Archer, Nicolas Bourgeois, et al.. (2023). All-Optical GeV Electron Bunch Generation in a Laser-Plasma Accelerator via Truncated-Channel Injection. Physical Review Letters. 131(24). 245001–245001. 11 indexed citations
9.
Alejo, A., et al.. (2022). Demonstration of kilohertz operation of hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 25(1). 14 indexed citations
10.
Hooker, S. M., et al.. (2021). GeV-scale accelerators driven by plasma-modulated pulses from kilohertz lasers. arXiv (Cornell University). 16 indexed citations
11.
Alejo, A., R. J. Shalloo, L. Corner, et al.. (2020). Meter-scale conditioned hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels. Physical review. E. 102(5). 53201–53201. 26 indexed citations
12.
Wiegandt, Florian, Patrick N. Anderson, Fei Yu, et al.. (2019). Quasi-phase-matched high-harmonic generation in gas-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fiber. Optica. 6(4). 442–442. 13 indexed citations
13.
Wiegandt, Florian, et al.. (2019). Optimised XUV holography using spatially shaped high harmonic beams. Optics Express. 27(20). 29016–29016. 3 indexed citations
14.
Dyson, A., et al.. (2016). A compact, low cost Marx bank for generating capillary discharge plasmas. Review of Scientific Instruments. 87(9). 93302–93302. 6 indexed citations
15.
O’Keeffe, Kevin, et al.. (2014). Quasi-phase-matched high-order harmonic generation using tunable pulse trains. Optics Express. 22(7). 7722–7722. 13 indexed citations
16.
Bourgeois, Nicolas, et al.. (2013). Two-Pulse Ionization Injection into Quasilinear Laser Wakefields. Physical Review Letters. 111(15). 155004–155004. 29 indexed citations
17.
O’Keeffe, Kevin, et al.. (2012). Quasi-phase-matching high harmonic generation using trains of pulses produced using an array of birefringent plates. Optics Express. 20(6). 6236–6236. 23 indexed citations
18.
Nakamura, K., Bob Nagler, Csaba Tóth, et al.. (2008). GeV electron beams from cm-scale channel guided laser wakefield accelerator. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
19.
Gonsalves, A. J., K. Nakamura, Csaba Tóth, et al.. (2007). Experimental Demonstration of 1 GeV Energy Gain in a Laser Wakefield Accelerator. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 49. 1 indexed citations
20.
Geddes, C. G. R., E. Esarey, P. Michel, et al.. (2006). Low energy spread 100 MeV-1 GeV electron bunches from laser wakefiel d acceleration at LOASIS. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026