GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys418 →Countries where authors are citing GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator
This map shows the geographic impact of GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator more than expected).
Fields of papers citing GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator
This network shows the impact of GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator.
About GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Wim Leemans, Bob Nagler, A. J. Gonsalves, Csaba Tóth, K. Nakamura, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder and S. M. Hooker covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (722 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (651 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys418.