This map shows the geographic impact of S. Lami's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Lami with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Lami more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Lami. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Lami. The network helps show where S. Lami may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Lami
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Lami.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Lami based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. Lami. S. Lami is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cenci, P., G. Anzivino, F. Bucci, et al.. (2013). The ring imaging Cherenkov detector of the NA62 experiment at CERN. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 732. 342–345.2 indexed citations
4.
Quinto, M., M. Berretti, E. David, et al.. (2011). The TOTEM GEM Telescope (T2) at the LHC. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 215(1). 225–227.1 indexed citations
5.
Bagliesi, M. G., M. Berretti, R. Cecchi, et al.. (2009). The TOTEM modular trigger system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 617(1-3). 313–315.1 indexed citations
6.
Bagliesi, M. G., M. Berretti, E. Brücken, et al.. (2009). The TOTEM T2 telescope based on triple-GEM chambers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 617(1-3). 134–137.23 indexed citations
Lami, S., G. Latino, E. Oliveri, L. Ropelewski, & N. Turini. (2007). A triple-GEM telescope for the TOTEM experiment. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 172. 231–233.8 indexed citations
9.
Lami, S.. (2006). TOTEM: The experiment to measure the total proton–proton cross section at LHC.2 indexed citations
10.
Gallinaro, M., et al.. (2003). The CDF MiniPlug calorimeters at the Tevatron. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 518(1-2). 42–44.1 indexed citations
11.
Kuhlmann, S., H. Frisch, J. Huston, et al.. (2003). The CDF calorimeter upgrade for Run IIb. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 518(1-2). 39–41.7 indexed citations
12.
Goulianos, K., M. Gallinaro, K. Hatakeyama, et al.. (2002). The CDF MiniPlug calorimeters. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 496(2-3). 333–346.2 indexed citations
13.
Bocci, A., S. E. Kuhlmann, S. Lami, & G. Latino. (2001). STUDY OF JET ENERGY RESOLUTION AT CDF. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 16(supp01a). 255–258.4 indexed citations
Bosman, M., D. Costanzo, G. Azuelos, et al.. (1998). Jet Finder Library: version 1.0. CERN Bulletin.2 indexed citations
16.
Bosi, F., G. Carboni, V. Cavasinni, et al.. (1989). Performance of the UA2 jet vertex detector at the CERN collider. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 283(3). 532–538.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.