S. Kreim

1.8k total citations
22 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

S. Kreim is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Kreim has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 10 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 8 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in S. Kreim's work include Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (8 papers). S. Kreim is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (8 papers). S. Kreim collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. S. Kreim's co-authors include M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, D. Lunney, K. Blaum, R. Wolf, Ch. Borgmann, Κ. Zuber, F. Herfurth, D. Neidherr and D. Beck and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, New Journal of Physics and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

S. Kreim

21 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Kreim Germany 13 354 262 164 149 63 22 562
V. Manea France 12 302 0.9× 224 0.9× 145 0.9× 131 0.9× 58 0.9× 30 513
Ch. Borgmann Switzerland 10 323 0.9× 221 0.8× 140 0.9× 122 0.8× 46 0.7× 12 475
F. Wienholtz Germany 12 293 0.8× 289 1.1× 223 1.4× 140 0.9× 61 1.0× 35 558
D. Neidherr Germany 14 526 1.5× 365 1.4× 217 1.3× 201 1.3× 72 1.1× 34 749
J. Stanja Germany 7 234 0.7× 192 0.7× 120 0.7× 89 0.6× 54 0.9× 8 404
M. Rosenbusch Germany 17 607 1.7× 470 1.8× 363 2.2× 243 1.6× 78 1.2× 58 967
R. Wolf Germany 17 480 1.4× 527 2.0× 374 2.3× 219 1.5× 71 1.1× 44 957
S. George Germany 17 720 2.0× 469 1.8× 197 1.2× 263 1.8× 43 0.7× 36 914
K. Blaum Germany 19 630 1.8× 627 2.4× 192 1.2× 221 1.5× 46 0.7× 36 930
E. Otten Germany 15 396 1.1× 502 1.9× 278 1.7× 242 1.6× 17 0.3× 31 795

Countries citing papers authored by S. Kreim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Kreim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Kreim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Kreim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Kreim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Kreim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Kreim. The network helps show where S. Kreim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Kreim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Kreim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Kreim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Kreim. S. Kreim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huang, W. J., D. Atanasov, G. Audi, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of high-precision atomic masses of A ∼ 50–80 and rare-earth nuclides measured with ISOLTRAP. The European Physical Journal A. 55(6). 1 indexed citations
2.
Welker, A., P. Filianin, N. Althubiti, et al.. (2017). Precision electron-capture energy in 202Pb and its relevance for neutrino mass determination. The European Physical Journal A. 53(7). 5 indexed citations
3.
Roubin, A. de, D. Atanasov, K. Blaum, et al.. (2017). Nuclear deformation in the A100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions. Physical review. C. 96(1). 32 indexed citations
4.
Atanasov, D., D. Beck, K. Blaum, et al.. (2017). Precision mass measurements of cesium isotopes—new entries in the ISOLTRAP chronicles. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 44(4). 44004–44004. 9 indexed citations
5.
Atanasov, D., K. Blaum, S. George, et al.. (2016). IS532: Mass spectrometry of neutron-rich chromium isotopes into the N = 40 "island of inversion". CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
6.
Kreim, S., F. Wienholtz, & R. Wolf. (2014). Multi-Reflection Time-of-Flight Mass Separation and Spectrometry. Nuclear Physics News. 24(2). 20–23. 1 indexed citations
7.
Gottberg, A., Teresa Mendonça, R. Luís, et al.. (2014). Experimental tests of an advanced proton-to-neutron converter at ISOLDE-CERN. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 336. 143–148. 17 indexed citations
8.
Wolf, R., D. Beck, K. Blaum, et al.. (2013). Plumbing Neutron Stars to New Depths with the Binding Energy of the Exotic NuclideZn82. Physical Review Letters. 110(4). 41101–41101. 125 indexed citations
9.
Wolf, R., D. Atanasov, D. Beck, et al.. (2013). ISOLTRAP's multi-reflection time-of-flight mass separator/spectrometer. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 349-350. 123–133. 108 indexed citations
10.
Rosenbusch, M., D. Atanasov, K. Blaum, et al.. (2013). Ion bunch stacking in a Penning trap after purification in an electrostatic mirror trap. Applied Physics B. 114(1-2). 147–155. 13 indexed citations
11.
Kreim, S., Matthias Hempel, D. Lunney, & Jürgen Schaffner–Bielich. (2013). Nuclear masses and neutron stars. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 349-350. 63–68. 23 indexed citations
12.
Lunney, D., et al.. (2013). Plumbing the depths of neutron stars. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 53(3). 24. 1 indexed citations
13.
Manea, V., D. Atanasov, D. Beck, et al.. (2013). Collective degrees of freedom of neutron-richA100nuclei and the first mass measurement of the short-lived nuclide100Rb. Physical Review C. 88(5). 20 indexed citations
14.
Fink, David, J. Barea, D. Beck, et al.. (2012). QValue and Half-Lives for the Double-β-Decay NuclidePd110. Physical Review Letters. 108(6). 62502–62502. 26 indexed citations
15.
Wolf, R., D. Beck, K. Blaum, et al.. (2012). On-line separation of short-lived nuclei by a multi-reflection time-of-flight device. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 686. 82–90. 93 indexed citations
16.
Rosenbusch, M., Ch. Böhm, Ch. Borgmann, et al.. (2012). A study of octupolar excitation for mass-selective centering in Penning traps. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 314. 6–12. 7 indexed citations
18.
Naimi, S., G. Audi, D. Beck, et al.. (2010). Critical-Point Boundary for the Nuclear Quantum Phase Transition NearA=100from Mass Measurements ofKr96,97. Physical Review Letters. 105(3). 32502–32502. 34 indexed citations
19.
Kreim, S.. (2009). Direct observation of a single proton in a Penning trap. GSI Repository (German Federal Government). 1 indexed citations
20.
Kracke, Holger, S. Kreim, A. Mooser, et al.. (2009). g-factor experiments on simple systems in Penning traps. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 42(15). 154021–154021. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026