J. Stanja

1.3k total citations
8 papers, 404 citations indexed

About

J. Stanja is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Stanja has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 404 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in J. Stanja's work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). J. Stanja is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). J. Stanja collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Switzerland. J. Stanja's co-authors include D. Lunney, D. Beck, M. Rosenbusch, S. Kreim, F. Herfurth, L. Schweikhard, K. Blaum, Ch. Borgmann, Κ. Zuber and R. Wolf and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, New Journal of Physics and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

J. Stanja

8 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Stanja Germany	7	234	192	120	89	54	8	404
V. Manea France	12	302 1.3×	224 1.2×	145 1.2×	131 1.5×	58 1.1×	30	513
F. Wienholtz Germany	12	293 1.3×	289 1.5×	223 1.9×	140 1.6×	61 1.1×	35	558
S. Kreim Germany	13	354 1.5×	262 1.4×	164 1.4×	149 1.7×	63 1.2×	22	562
Ch. Borgmann Switzerland	10	323 1.4×	221 1.2×	140 1.2×	122 1.4×	46 0.9×	12	475
D. Neidherr Germany	14	526 2.2×	365 1.9×	217 1.8×	201 2.3×	72 1.3×	34	749
Ch. Böhm Germany	9	255 1.1×	170 0.9×	84 0.7×	112 1.3×	45 0.8×	13	402
C. Geppert Germany	11	166 0.7×	223 1.2×	103 0.9×	108 1.2×	11 0.2×	21	376
V. V. Simon Germany	13	375 1.6×	266 1.4×	109 0.9×	123 1.4×	17 0.3×	30	485
M. Reponen Finland	15	400 1.7×	261 1.4×	120 1.0×	161 1.8×	18 0.3×	51	524
M. Froese Germany	10	153 0.7×	252 1.3×	143 1.2×	57 0.6×	54 1.0×	17	363

Countries citing papers authored by J. Stanja

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Stanja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Stanja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Stanja more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Stanja

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Stanja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Stanja. The network helps show where J. Stanja may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Stanja

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Stanja. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Stanja based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Stanja. J. Stanja is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Stanja, J., U. Hergenhahn, H. Niemann, et al.. (2016). Characterization of the NEPOMUC primary and remoderated positron beams at different energies. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 827. 52–62. 15 indexed citations

2.

Saitoh, H., J. Stanja, E. V. Stenson, et al.. (2015). Efficient injection of an intense positron beam into a dipole magnetic field. New Journal of Physics. 17(10). 103038–103038. 29 indexed citations

3.

Stenson, E. V., H. Saitoh, J. Stanja, et al.. (2015). Progress toward positron-electron pair plasma experiments. AIP conference proceedings. 1668. 40004–40004. 6 indexed citations

4.

Wolf, R., D. Beck, K. Blaum, et al.. (2013). Plumbing Neutron Stars to New Depths with the Binding Energy of the Exotic NuclideZn82. Physical Review Letters. 110(4). 41101–41101. 125 indexed citations

5.

Wolf, R., D. Atanasov, D. Beck, et al.. (2013). ISOLTRAP's multi-reflection time-of-flight mass separator/spectrometer. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 349-350. 123–133. 108 indexed citations

6.

Fink, David, J. Barea, D. Beck, et al.. (2012). QValue and Half-Lives for the Double-β-Decay NuclidePd110. Physical Review Letters. 108(6). 62502–62502. 26 indexed citations

7.

Wolf, R., D. Beck, K. Blaum, et al.. (2012). On-line separation of short-lived nuclei by a multi-reflection time-of-flight device. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 686. 82–90. 93 indexed citations

8.

Beck, D., K. Blaum, F. Herfurth, et al.. (2011). Seeking the purported magic number N= 32 with high-precision mass spectrometry. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact