S. H. Yarnell
- Topics
- Seed and Plant Biochemistry (1 paper)
- Journals
- The Botanical Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
S. H. Yarnell
4 papers receiving 127 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
- Plant Science 135
- Molecular Biology 71
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 24
- Genetics 11
- Soil Science 8
Countries citing papers authored by S. H. Yarnell
This map shows the geographic impact of S. H. Yarnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. H. Yarnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. H. Yarnell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. H. Yarnell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. H. Yarnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. H. Yarnell. The network helps show where S. H. Yarnell may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 80 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 5 |
About S. H. Yarnell
S. H. Yarnell is a scholar working on Food Science, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 4 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seed and Plant Biochemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (135 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (24 citations) and Molecular Biology (71 citations). S. H. Yarnell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as The Botanical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.