S. H. Lovibond
- Clinical Psychology top 0.05%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.1%
- Social Psychology top 0.1%
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Topics
- Behavioral and Psychological Studies (8 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
S. H. Lovibond
29 papers receiving 16.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
- Clinical Psychology 9.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.2k
- Social Psychology 3.8k
- General Health Professions 2.2k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.1k
Countries citing papers authored by S. H. Lovibond
This map shows the geographic impact of S. H. Lovibond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. H. Lovibond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. H. Lovibond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. H. Lovibond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. H. Lovibond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. H. Lovibond. The network helps show where S. H. Lovibond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. H. Lovibond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. H. Lovibond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. H. Lovibond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. H. Lovibond. S. H. Lovibond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventoriesbreakdown → | 10477 |
| 2 | Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2breakdown → | 5887 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 57 |
About S. H. Lovibond
S. H. Lovibond is a scholar working on General Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 16.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (9.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (1.6k citations). S. H. Lovibond has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter F. Lovibond, Glenn R. Caddy, N. McConaghy, Donald K. McNicol, Ivana Holloway and Diana Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Psychophysiology and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.