S. Clément

558 total citations
9 papers, 463 citations indexed

About

S. Clément is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Radiation and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Clément has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 463 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Computational Mechanics, 3 papers in Radiation and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in S. Clément's work include Ion-surface interactions and analysis (4 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers). S. Clément is often cited by papers focused on Ion-surface interactions and analysis (4 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers). S. Clément collaborates with scholars based in Australia and China. S. Clément's co-authors include Peter Holden, T. R. Ireland, P. Lanc, J. J. Foster, Ian S. Williams, Joe Hiess, Ryan B. Ickert, W. Compston, Gillian M. Newstead and Dennis Corrigan and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Geology, Applied Surface Science and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

In The Last Decade

S. Clément

9 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
S. Clément Australia	7	360	171	67	66	61	9	463
P. Lanc Australia	6	440 1.2×	195 1.1×	74 1.1×	74 1.1×	69 1.1×	8	528
Ryan B. Ickert United States	18	849 2.4×	288 1.7×	91 1.4×	104 1.6×	105 1.7×	35	961
Louise Gall United Kingdom	5	421 1.2×	117 0.7×	112 1.7×	57 0.9×	55 0.9×	6	582
François-Xavier d’Abzac France	13	342 0.9×	166 1.0×	56 0.8×	74 1.1×	40 0.7×	17	519
Martijn Klaver United Kingdom	15	564 1.6×	138 0.8×	112 1.7×	88 1.3×	68 1.1×	35	710
Martin Oeser Germany	14	381 1.1×	112 0.7×	176 2.6×	105 1.6×	71 1.2×	23	575
Diane K. McDaniel United States	8	268 0.7×	105 0.6×	176 2.6×	61 0.9×	49 0.8×	11	353
Edward Inglis France	12	568 1.6×	127 0.7×	205 3.1×	65 1.0×	94 1.5×	24	681
M. Le Voyer United States	14	706 2.0×	122 0.7×	40 0.6×	58 0.9×	34 0.6×	23	854
E. J. D. Kable South Africa	10	701 1.9×	319 1.9×	171 2.6×	69 1.0×	56 0.9×	13	747

Countries citing papers authored by S. Clément

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Clément's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Clément with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Clément more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Clément

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Clément. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Clément. The network helps show where S. Clément may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Clément

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Clément. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Clément based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Clément. S. Clément is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Long, Tao, S. Clément, Hangqiang Xie, & Dunyi Liu. (2020). Design, construction and performance of a TOF-SIMS for analysis of trace elements in geological materials. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 450. 116289–116289. 10 indexed citations

2.

Long, Tao, et al.. (2018). High spatial resolution and high brightness ion beam probe for in-situ elemental and isotopic analysis. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 419. 19–25. 4 indexed citations

3.

Long, Tao, et al.. (2015). Influence of Edge Effect and X-Y Effect on Measurement Precision in Sensitive High Resolution Ion Microprobe IIe MC Oxygen Isotopes Analysis. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 43(12). 1888–1894. 1 indexed citations

4.

Ireland, T. R., Peter Holden, P. Lanc, et al.. (2014). Charge-mode electrometer measurements of S-isotopic compositions on SHRIMP-SI. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 359. 26–37. 64 indexed citations

5.

Ireland, T. R., S. Clément, J. J. Foster, et al.. (2008). Development of SHRIMP. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. 55(6-7). 937–954. 67 indexed citations

6.

Ickert, Ryan B., Joe Hiess, Ian S. Williams, et al.. (2008). Determining high precision, in situ, oxygen isotope ratios with a SHRIMP II: Analyses of MPI-DING silicate-glass reference materials and zircon from contrasting granites. Chemical Geology. 257(1-2). 114–128. 266 indexed citations

7.

Compston, W. & S. Clément. (2006). The geological microprobe: The first 25 years of dating zircons. Applied Surface Science. 252(19). 7089–7095. 9 indexed citations

8.

Clément, S., W. Compston, & Gillian M. Newstead. (1977). DESIGN OF A LARGE, HIGH RESOLUTION ION MICROPROBE †. 20 indexed citations

9.

Clément, S. & W. Compston. (1973). The design and performance of a mass spectrometer using beam transport theory. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Physics. 10(3). 323–342. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact