S. Arulsekar
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dan E. ParfittMajid R. FooladF. A. BlissViviana BecerraDale E. KesterThomas M. GradzielR. S. BringhurstMarilyn L. Warburton
- Topics
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research (13 papers)Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (9 papers)Nuts composition and effects (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaChina
In The Last Decade
S. Arulsekar
23 papers receiving 655 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Plant Science 592
- Molecular Biology 315
- Nutrition and Dietetics 170
- Cell Biology 141
- Endocrinology 139
Countries citing papers authored by S. Arulsekar
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Arulsekar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Arulsekar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Arulsekar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. Arulsekar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Arulsekar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Arulsekar. The network helps show where S. Arulsekar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Arulsekar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Arulsekar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Arulsekar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Arulsekar. S. Arulsekar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PEACH AND ALMOND AND RELATED SPECIES DETECTED BY SSR MARKERS | 21 |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 84 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 85 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | INHERITANCE AND ISOENZYME DIVERSITY FOR GPI AND PGM AMONG GRAPE CULTIVARS | 10 |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 90 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 62 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | Verticillium wilt resistance in the cultivated strawberries and preliminary studies on isozyme genetics in Fragaria. | 1 |
About S. Arulsekar
S. Arulsekar is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (13 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (9 papers) and Nuts composition and effects (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (139 citations), Plant Science (592 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (170 citations). S. Arulsekar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and China. Frequent co-authors include Dan E. Parfitt, Majid R. Foolad, F. A. Bliss, Viviana Becerra, Dale E. Kester, Thomas M. Gradziel, R. S. Bringhurst, Marilyn L. Warburton, P. Martínez‐Gómez and V. Voth. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Journal of Heredity and Genome.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.