Ryan W. Shultz
- Nephrology top 5%
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes 3
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies 3
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 2
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 2
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 3
-
- Renal and Vascular Pathologies 3
-
- nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions 1
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Kari Nejak‐BowenJunwei YangYouhua LiuRodney E. WegnerWendy M. MarsChunsun DaiSophie J. BakriKapil Kapoor
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Investigation (3 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (1 paper)Seminars in Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJordanCanada
In The Last Decade
Ryan W. Shultz
8 papers receiving 457 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Nephrology 176
- Cancer Research 86
- Ophthalmology 51
- Hematology 52
- Hepatology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Ryan W. Shultz
This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan W. Shultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan W. Shultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan W. Shultz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan W. Shultz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan W. Shultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan W. Shultz. The network helps show where Ryan W. Shultz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ryan W. Shultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 3 | Sustained-release Intravitreal Dexamethasone As A Surgical Adjuvant In The Repair Of Complicated Retinal Detachment With Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy | 2012 | 1 |
| 4 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 208 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 181 |
About Ryan W. Shultz
Ryan W. Shultz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Nephrology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (3 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (3 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (1 paper) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (176 citations), Cancer Research (86 citations), Ophthalmology (51 citations), Hematology (52 citations) and Hepatology (36 citations). Ryan W. Shultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Jordan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kari Nejak‐Bowen, Junwei Yang, Youhua Liu, Rodney E. Wegner, Wendy M. Mars, Chunsun Dai, Sophie J. Bakri, Kapil Kapoor, Mary Jane Shultz and Nakhleh Abu‐Yaghi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Seminars in Ophthalmology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Eye.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.