Ruud Koolen

560 total citations
24 papers, 270 citations indexed

About

Ruud Koolen is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruud Koolen has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 270 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 13 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 4 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Ruud Koolen's work include Speech and dialogue systems (12 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers). Ruud Koolen is often cited by papers focused on Speech and dialogue systems (12 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers). Ruud Koolen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Malta and Singapore. Ruud Koolen's co-authors include Emiel Krahmer, Martijn Goudbeek, Albert Gatt, Marc Swerts, Hans Westerbeek, Alfons Maes, Emiel van Miltenburg, Mariët Theune, Ákos Kádár and Marret K. Noordewier and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Memory and Language and Cognitive Science.

In The Last Decade

Ruud Koolen

23 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Ruud Koolen
Jean Fox Tree United States
Marc Tomlinson United States
Rachel Morton United Kingdom
Jean Fox Tree United States
Ruud Koolen
Citations per year, relative to Ruud Koolen Ruud Koolen (= 1×) peers Jean Fox Tree

Countries citing papers authored by Ruud Koolen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruud Koolen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruud Koolen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruud Koolen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruud Koolen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruud Koolen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruud Koolen. The network helps show where Ruud Koolen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruud Koolen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruud Koolen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruud Koolen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruud Koolen. Ruud Koolen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Koolen, Ruud & Emiel Krahmer. (2024). Realistic About Reference Production: Testing the Effects of Domain Size and Saturation. Cognitive Science. 48(6). e13473–e13473.
2.
Koolen, Ruud, et al.. (2021). Communicating Climate Change to a Local but Diverse Audience: On the Positive Impact of Locality Framing. Environmental Communication. 16(2). 243–261. 10 indexed citations
3.
Koolen, Ruud. (2019). On Visually-Grounded Reference Production: Testing the Effects of Perceptual Grouping and 2D/3D Presentation Mode. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 2247–2247. 2 indexed citations
4.
Miltenburg, Emiel van, et al.. (2019). On task effects in NLG corpus elicitation: a replication study using mixed effects modeling. Research portal (Tilburg University). 403–408. 2 indexed citations
5.
Miltenburg, Emiel van, Ruud Koolen, & Emiel Krahmer. (2018). Varying image description tasks: spoken versus written descriptions. Research portal (Tilburg University). 88–100. 7 indexed citations
6.
Koolen, Ruud, et al.. (2017). Eye movements during reference production: Testing the effects of perceptual grouping on referential overspecification. Cognitive Science. 2439–2444. 1 indexed citations
7.
Koolen, Ruud, Albert Gatt, Emiel Krahmer, Roger P. G. van Gompel, & Kees van Deemter. (2016). Viewing time affects overspecification: Evidence for two strategies of attribute selection during reference production. Cognitive Science. 159–164. 1 indexed citations
8.
Koolen, Ruud, Emiel Krahmer, & Marc Swerts. (2016). Developmental Changes in Children’s Processing of Redundant Modifiers in Definite Object Descriptions. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1900–1900. 2 indexed citations
9.
Westerbeek, Hans, Ruud Koolen, & Alfons Maes. (2015). Stored object knowledge and the production of referring expressions: the case of color typicality. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 935–935. 28 indexed citations
10.
Koolen, Ruud, Emiel Krahmer, & Marc Swerts. (2015). How Distractor Objects Trigger Referential Overspecification: Testing the Effects of Visual Clutter and Distractor Distance. Cognitive Science. 40(7). 1617–1647. 15 indexed citations
11.
Koolen, Ruud, et al.. (2014). How perceived distractor distance influences reference production: Effects of perceptual grouping in 2D and 3D scenes. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 2507–2512. 3 indexed citations
12.
Koolen, Ruud, Emiel Krahmer, & Marc Swerts. (2013). The impact of bottom-up and top-down saliency cues on reference production. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 817–822. 2 indexed citations
13.
Krahmer, Emiel, Marret K. Noordewier, Martijn Goudbeek, & Ruud Koolen. (2013). How big is the BFG? The impact of redundant size adjectives on size perception. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 2772–2777. 2 indexed citations
14.
Koolen, Ruud, Martijn Goudbeek, & Emiel Krahmer. (2013). The Effect of Scene Variation on the Redundant Use of Color in Definite Reference. Cognitive Science. 37(2). 395–411. 47 indexed citations
15.
Koolen, Ruud, Martijn Goudbeek, & Emiel Krahmer. (2011). Effects of scene variation on referential overspecification. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 1025–1030. 6 indexed citations
16.
Theune, Mariët, Ruud Koolen, Emiel Krahmer, & Sander Wubben. (2011). Does Size Matter -- How Much Data is Required to Train a REG Algorithm?. Research portal (Tilburg University). 660–664. 5 indexed citations
17.
Koolen, Ruud, et al.. (2011). GREEBLES Greeble greeb. On reduction in speech and gesture in repeated references.. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 3250–3255. 8 indexed citations
18.
Theune, Mariët, Ruud Koolen, & Emiel Krahmer. (2010). Cross-linguistic attribute selection for REG: comparing Dutch and English. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 191–195. 5 indexed citations
19.
Koolen, Ruud & Emiel Krahmer. (2010). The D-TUNA Corpus : A Dutch dataset for the evaluation of referring expression generation algorithms. Language Resources and Evaluation. 122–128. 9 indexed citations
20.
Koolen, Ruud, Albert Gatt, Martijn Goudbeek, & Emiel Krahmer. (2009). Need I Say More? On Factors Causing Referential Overspecification (poster). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–7. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026