Ruth Rea

923 total citations
10 papers, 730 citations indexed

About

Ruth Rea is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Rea has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 730 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Ruth Rea's work include Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers). Ruth Rea is often cited by papers focused on Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers). Ruth Rea collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Ruth Rea's co-authors include Eric Boitier, Michael R. Duchen, Dimitri M. Kullmann, Alexander Spauschus, L. H. Eunson, Peter Sterling, Richard Krämer, Michael G. Hanna, Edwin S. Levitan and C. P. Panayiotopoulos and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuron, The Journal of Cell Biology and The Journal of Physiology.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Rea

10 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Rea United Kingdom 8 597 444 110 100 72 10 730
E. Mancinelli Italy 17 651 1.1× 585 1.3× 107 1.0× 55 0.6× 131 1.8× 28 807
Milena Menegola United States 10 662 1.1× 550 1.2× 258 2.3× 64 0.6× 30 0.4× 11 825
John B. Denny United States 10 375 0.6× 266 0.6× 113 1.0× 127 1.3× 24 0.3× 16 646
Chi S. Ho United States 12 395 0.7× 330 0.7× 88 0.8× 105 1.1× 41 0.6× 16 580
Sheridan L. Swope United States 14 819 1.4× 614 1.4× 31 0.3× 127 1.3× 36 0.5× 17 1.0k
Yuka Maeno-Hikichi United States 10 686 1.1× 247 0.6× 44 0.4× 115 1.1× 55 0.8× 12 891
Mitsuhiro Ino Japan 11 349 0.6× 267 0.6× 38 0.3× 42 0.4× 61 0.8× 20 595
Andrew D. Piekarz United States 10 472 0.8× 371 0.8× 78 0.7× 51 0.5× 38 0.5× 13 711
Marta García France 9 405 0.7× 265 0.6× 28 0.3× 65 0.7× 51 0.7× 13 605
K.‐H. Braunewell Germany 16 335 0.6× 295 0.7× 30 0.3× 100 1.0× 44 0.6× 20 620

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Rea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Rea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Rea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Rea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Rea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Rea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Rea. The network helps show where Ruth Rea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Rea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Rea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Rea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Rea. Ruth Rea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Borghuis, Bart G., et al.. (2005). Encoding Light Intensity by the Cone Photoreceptor Synapse. Neuron. 48(6). 1067–1067. 3 indexed citations
2.
Borghuis, Bart G., et al.. (2005). Encoding Light Intensity by the Cone Photoreceptor Synapse. Neuron. 48(4). 555–562. 60 indexed citations
3.
Rea, Ruth, et al.. (2004). Streamlined Synaptic Vesicle Cycle in Cone Photoreceptor Terminals. Neuron. 41(5). 755–766. 104 indexed citations
4.
Rea, Ruth, Marina A.J. Tijssen, Colin Herd, Rune R. Frants, & Dimitri M. Kullmann. (2002). Functional characterization of compound heterozygosity for GlyRα1 mutations in the startle disease hyperekplexia. European Journal of Neuroscience. 16(2). 186–196. 26 indexed citations
5.
Rea, Ruth, Alexander Spauschus, L. H. Eunson, Michael G. Hanna, & Dimitri M. Kullmann. (2002). Variable K+ channel subunit dysfunction in inherited mutations of KCNA1. The Journal of Physiology. 538(1). 5–23. 51 indexed citations
6.
Kullmann, Dimitri M., Ruth Rea, Alexander Spauschus, & Anne Jouvenceau. (2001). The Inherited Episodic Ataxias: How Well Do We Understand the Disease Mechanisms?. The Neuroscientist. 7(1). 80–88. 19 indexed citations
7.
Rea, Ruth, et al.. (2000). Functional analysis of compound heterozygosity in hyperekplexia mutations of the human glycine receptor alpha 1 subunit.. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
8.
Eunson, L. H., Ruth Rea, Sameer M. Zuberi, et al.. (2000). Clinical, genetic, and expression studies of mutations in the potassium channel gene KCNA1 reveal new phenotypic variability. Annals of Neurology. 48(4). 647–656. 196 indexed citations
9.
Eunson, L. H., Ruth Rea, Sameer M. Zuberi, et al.. (2000). Clinical, genetic, and expression studies of mutations in the potassium channel gene KCNA1 reveal new phenotypic variability. Annals of Neurology. 48(4). 647–656. 20 indexed citations
10.
Boitier, Eric, Ruth Rea, & Michael R. Duchen. (1999). Mitochondria Exert a Negative Feedback on the Propagation of Intracellular Ca2+ Waves in Rat Cortical Astrocytes. The Journal of Cell Biology. 145(4). 795–808. 250 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026