Ruth Pinder

1.4k citations
30 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Pinder

28 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

Ruth Pinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Medical Terminology 3
  • Pharmacology 143
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 110
  • Pharmacology 61
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 120
Replace Tessa J. Parsons with:
Tessa J. Parsons United Kingdom
J. Taylor Hays United States
Charles E. Yesalis United States
José R. Fernández United States
Duleeka Knipe United Kingdom
Koichi Miyaki Japan
Alan Flint United States
Bryan M. Johnstone United States
Elbert D. Glover United States
Dan Luo China
Ruth Pinder relative to Tessa J. Parsons United Kingdom Tessa J. Parsons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tessa J. Parsons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Pinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Pinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Pinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Pinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Pinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Pinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Pinder. The network helps show where Ruth Pinder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Pinder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Pinder Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Pinder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975169
2 1976158
3 1976135
4 200890
5 200576
6 199576
7 197463
8 197648
9 197536
10 200834
11 199232
12 199032
13 197628
14
The Management of Chronic Illness: Patient and Doctor Perspectives on Parkinson's Disease
199026
15 199220
16 199015
17
Talking about my patient: the Balint approach in GP education.
200610
18 19987
19 19947
20 19925

About Ruth Pinder

Ruth Pinder is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (2 papers) and Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (3 citations), Pharmacology (143 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (110 citations), Pharmacology (61 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (120 citations). Ruth Pinder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Phyllis R. Sawyer, G.S. Avery, T.M. Speight, Rex N. Brogden, John Green, Anthony Kessel, Chris Grundy, Yvonne Carter, Roland Petchey and S. E. Shaw. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs, Sociology of Health & Illness, Family Practice, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Ethnography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact