Ruth Parks

697 total citations
44 papers, 415 citations indexed

About

Ruth Parks is a scholar working on Oncology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Parks has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 415 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Oncology, 15 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 15 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Ruth Parks's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (14 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (13 papers). Ruth Parks is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (14 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (13 papers). Ruth Parks collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Ruth Parks's co-authors include Kwok‐Leung Cheung, Bronek M. Boszczyk, Eyal Behrbalk, Ofir Uri, Gregg Nelson, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh, L. Winterbottom, D.A.L. Morgan, Karen Cox and Simon J. Johnston and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Parks

40 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Ruth Parks

SURGE

PFM

ONCOL

Jennifer M. Racz United States

A.J. Breugom Netherlands

T. Evans United Kingdom

Aurora Mirabile Italy

Luca Afferi Switzerland

Il Tae Son South Korea

Min‐Hoe Chew Singapore

Brice Jabo United States

Tamer Çolakoğlu Türkiye

Zheng‐Qiang Wei China

Jennifer M. Racz United States

Ruth Parks

170 ×0.9

SURGE

117 ×0.8

PFM

102 ×0.7

ONCOL

122 ×1.2

18 ×0.3

Citations per year, relative to Ruth Parks Ruth Parks (= 1×) peers Jennifer M. Racz

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Parks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Parks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Parks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Parks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Parks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Parks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Parks. The network helps show where Ruth Parks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Parks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Parks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Parks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Parks. Ruth Parks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Parks, Ruth, Lorenza Marotti, Antonio Ponti, et al.. (2024). Uptake of post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction in older women – A real-world analysis from the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) certified breast centres. European Journal of Cancer. 200. 113776–113776.

Malcolm, Francesca Ligori, et al.. (2024). Factors influencing older women's decision‐making related to treatment of operable breast cancer: A qualitative systematic review. Psycho-Oncology. 33(1). e6294–e6294. 1 indexed citations

Baxter, Mark, et al.. (2024). Patient-Reported Outcomes in Geriatric Oncology—Balancing Quality of Life and Therapeutic Effectiveness Using Primary Breast Cancer as a Model. Drugs & Aging. 42(1). 1–7. 1 indexed citations

Kalsi, Tania, Fábio Gomes, Michael Lind, et al.. (2023). Geriatric Oncology as an Unmet Workforce Training Need in the United Kingdom—A Narrative Review by the British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies (BONUS) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) UK Country Group. Cancers. 15(19). 4782–4782. 4 indexed citations

Chia, Z, et al.. (2023). Oncoplastic breast surgery in older women with primary breast cancer: systematic review. British journal of surgery. 110(10). 1309–1315. 7 indexed citations

Parks, Ruth, et al.. (2023). The Association Between Medication Use in Older Women with Early-Stage Operable Primary Breast Cancer and Decision Regarding Primary Treatment. The Oncologist. 28(3). e128–e135.

Cardoso, Maria João, et al.. (2022). Immediate breast reconstruction uptake in older women with primary breast cancer: systematic review. British journal of surgery. 109(11). 1063–1072. 11 indexed citations

Parks, Ruth, Lutfi Alfarsi, Andrew R. Green, & Kwok‐Leung Cheung. (2021). Biology of primary breast cancer in older women beyond routine biomarkers. Breast Cancer. 28(5). 991–1001. 1 indexed citations

Parks, Ruth, et al.. (2021). The impact of breast cancer surgery on functional status in older women – A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(8). 1891–1899. 12 indexed citations

10.

Parks, Ruth, et al.. (2021). Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision specimens for Ki‐67 in breast cancer – a systematic review of the literature. Histopathology. 80(3). 468–484. 10 indexed citations

11.

Parks, Ruth, Andrew R. Green, & Kwok‐Leung Cheung. (2021). The impact of tumour biology on the management of primary breast cancer in older women—based on a research programme in Nottingham. Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham). 5. 5–5. 2 indexed citations

12.

Parks, Ruth, et al.. (2020). Patterns of biomarker expression in patients treated with primary endocrine therapy – a unique insight using core needle biopsy tissue microarray. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 185(3). 647–655. 2 indexed citations

13.

Parks, Ruth, et al.. (2019). Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer as a Distinct Disease: Implications for Therapeutic Strategy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(1). 1–11. 36 indexed citations

14.

Parks, Ruth & Kwok‐Leung Cheung. (2019). Personalising Care in the Older Woman with Primary Breast Cancer. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore. 48(11). 370–375. 7 indexed citations

15.

Parks, Ruth & Kwok‐Leung Cheung. (2017). Axillary reverse mapping in N0 patients requiring sentinel lymph node biopsy – A systematic review of the literature and necessity of a randomised study. The Breast. 33. 57–70. 10 indexed citations

16.

Parks, Ruth, Louise Hall, L. Winterbottom, et al.. (2014). The potential value of comprehensive geriatric assessment in evaluating older women with primary operable breast cancer undergoing surgery or non-operative treatment — A pilot study. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 6(1). 46–51. 25 indexed citations

17.

Behrbalk, Eyal, Ofir Uri, Ruth Parks, et al.. (2014). Posterior-only correction of Scheuermann kyphosis using pedicle screws: economical optimization through screw density reduction. European Spine Journal. 23(10). 2203–2210. 22 indexed citations

18.

Parks, Ruth, Matthias König, Bronek M. Boszczyk, & Masood Shafafy. (2012). Transarticular fusion for treatment of cystic lesion arising from an odontoid fracture. European Spine Journal. 22(1). 21–25. 8 indexed citations

19.

Parks, Ruth, et al.. (2012). Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older women with early breast cancer – a systematic review of literature. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 10(1). 88–88. 30 indexed citations

20.

Parks, Ruth & Gregg Nelson. (1993). Complications with the use of bioabsorbable pins in the foot.. PubMed. 32(2). 153–61. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact