Tamer Çolakoğlu

34 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Tamer Çolakoğlu
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Dermatology 80
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 136
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 125
  • Surgery 165
  • Cancer Research 52
Replace Shun C. Young with:
Shun C. Young United States
Luca Riccioni Italy
Peter S. Kennedy United States
Se‐Hoon Lee South Korea
Claus Bisgaard Denmark
Alvaro Restrepo United States
Krzysztof Ziaja Poland
Arzu Okur Türkiye
Ahmed Abdallah Egypt
Anupama Shahane United States
Tamer Çolakoğlu relative to Shun C. Young United States Shun C. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Shun C. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tamer Çolakoğlu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tamer Çolakoğlu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamer Çolakoğlu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamer Çolakoğlu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tamer Çolakoğlu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamer Çolakoğlu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamer Çolakoğlu. The network helps show where Tamer Çolakoğlu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tamer Çolakoğlu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tamer Çolakoğlu Line = papers co-authored together Tamer Çolakoğlu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200897
2 201564
3 201528
4 201118
5 201218
6 201617
7 201017
8 200615
9 200513
10 200712
11 200810
12
Dermatoses of the nipple.
20099
13 20108
14 20117
15 20087
16 20077
17 20117
18
[Use of drainage in surgery for perforated appendicitis: the effect on complications].
20107
19 20086
20 20096

About Tamer Çolakoğlu

Tamer Çolakoğlu is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Dermatology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (4 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (3 papers), Hernia repair and management (3 papers) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (80 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (136 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (125 citations), Surgery (165 citations) and Cancer Research (52 citations). Tamer Çolakoğlu has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Sedat Yıldırım, Ali Ezer, Mehmet Haberal, Turgut Noyan, Ayşin Pourbagher, Tarık Zafer Nursal, Alper Parlakgümüş, Sedat Bellı, Fazi̇let Kayaselçuk and Gökhan Moray. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Acta Radiologica, International Journal of Surgery and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact