Ruth Jones

2.2k total citations
8 papers, 158 citations indexed

About

Ruth Jones is a scholar working on Physiology, Infectious Diseases and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Jones has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 158 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Physiology, 2 papers in Infectious Diseases and 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Ruth Jones's work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). Ruth Jones is often cited by papers focused on Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). Ruth Jones collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Ruth Jones's co-authors include Emma L. Ashby, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Philip Scheltens, Patrick G. Kehoe, Majon Muller, Seth Love, Wiesje M. van der Flier, J. Scott Miners, Mirjam I. Geerlings and Ian Rees Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Alzheimer s Research & Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Jones

8 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ruth Jones United Kingdom	7	72	42	31	31	25	8	158
Auli Verkkoniemi‐Ahola Finland	10	80 1.1×	38 0.9×	8 0.3×	25 0.8×	12 0.5×	18	255
Insha Zahoor United States	7	20 0.3×	89 2.1×	9 0.3×	27 0.9×	5 0.2×	25	214
Craig Curtis United States	5	157 2.2×	61 1.5×	5 0.2×	30 1.0×	43 1.7×	10	286
Peiqing Chen China	10	47 0.7×	78 1.9×	9 0.3×	54 1.7×	6 0.2×	18	289
Torbjørn Lindahl Norway	6	120 1.7×	177 4.2×	5 0.2×	26 0.8×	32 1.3×	9	276
Feng Yuan China	10	33 0.5×	108 2.6×	27 0.9×	14 0.5×	3 0.1×	18	226
Fudan Miao Canada	6	88 1.2×	90 2.1×	98 3.2×	22 0.7×	8 0.3×	8	287
Jason E. Maas United States	7	30 0.4×	107 2.5×	38 1.2×	28 0.9×	9 0.4×	7	230
Tanda M. Dudenkov United States	4	73 1.0×	48 1.1×	2 0.1×	56 1.8×	10 0.4×	7	200

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Jones

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Jones

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Jones. The network helps show where Ruth Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Jones. Ruth Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Jones, Ruth, Robert Andrews, Peter Holmans, Matthew Hill, & Philip R. Taylor. (2021). Modest changes in Spi1 dosage reveal the potential for altered microglial function as seen in Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 14935–14935. 19 indexed citations

Jones, Ruth, et al.. (2021). Implementing Digitalised Lean Manufacturing Training in a UK Engine Manufacturing Centre During the SARS-CoV2 Pandemic of 2020. Procedia Manufacturing. 55. 571–579. 3 indexed citations

Jones, Ruth, et al.. (2021). Improving Lean Manufacturing Systems and Tools Engagement Through the Utilisation of Industry 4.0, Improved Communication and a People Recognition Methodology in a UK Engine Manufacturing Centre. Procedia Manufacturing. 55. 371–382. 17 indexed citations

Rodrigues, Patrícia, Aljawharah Alrubayyi, Ruth Jones, et al.. (2020). Innate immunology in COVID-19—a living review. Part II: dysregulated inflammation drives immunopathology. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 1(1). 15 indexed citations

Tellier, Michael, Fangfang Lu, Ruth Jones, et al.. (2020). Innate immunology in COVID-19—a living review. Part I: viral entry, sensing and evasion. PubMed. 1(1). iqaa004–iqaa004. 7 indexed citations

Flier, Wiesje M. van der, Emma L. Ashby, Charlotte E. Teunissen, et al.. (2015). Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Risk of Brain Atrophy. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 44(1). 153–162. 15 indexed citations

Teunissen, Charlotte E., Emma L. Ashby, Wiesje M. van der Flier, et al.. (2014). The association of angiotensin-converting enzyme with biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. 6(3). 27–27. 58 indexed citations

Miners, J. Scott, Ruth Jones, & Seth Love. (2014). Differential Changes in Aβ42 and Aβ40 with Age. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 40(3). 727–735. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact