Ruth Inslegers

545 citations
21 papers · 314 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (14 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers)
Partner nations
BelgiumNetherlandsCanada

In The Last Decade

Ruth Inslegers

20 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Ruth Inslegers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 160
  • Clinical Psychology 151
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Social Psychology 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
Replace Amy G. Weisman de Mamani with:
Amy G. Weisman de Mamani United States
Claire Maclean United Kingdom
Maria Hausberg Germany
Richard F. Summers United States
Fabienne Wartelsteiner Austria
Jason A. Seidel United States
Hugo J. Schielke United States
Shyhrete Rexhaj Switzerland
Martin S. Kesselman United States
Dorothy Nelson United States
Ruth Inslegers relative to Amy G. Weisman de Mamani United States Amy G. Weisman de Mamani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Amy G. Weisman de Mamani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Inslegers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Inslegers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Inslegers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Inslegers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Inslegers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Inslegers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Inslegers. The network helps show where Ruth Inslegers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Inslegers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Inslegers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Inslegers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Inslegers. Ruth Inslegers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 23
3 7
4 9
5 6
6 93
7 10
8 3
9 5
10 10
11 5
12 1
13 11
14 17
15 11
16 14
17
Interpersonal problems in alexithymia: a review
3
18 17
19 40
20 6

About Ruth Inslegers

Ruth Inslegers is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (14 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (160 citations), Family Practice (19 citations) and Clinical Psychology (151 citations). Ruth Inslegers has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stijn Vanheule, Reitske Meganck, Mattias Desmet, Jochem Willemsen, Graeme J. Taylor, Claudi Bockting, Chris Baeken, Femke Truijens, James D. A. Parker and Kateryna V. Keefer. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychology and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026