Ruth Ho

1.1k citations
10 papers · 882 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments 8
    • Signaling Pathways in Disease 3
    • Ion channel regulation and function 1
    • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors 1
    • Cell death mechanisms and regulation 1

Ruth Ho

10 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

Ruth Ho
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Neurology 431
  • Cancer Research 167
  • Developmental Neuroscience 31
  • Molecular Biology 536
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 120
Replace Loen M. Hansford with:
Loen M. Hansford Canada
Maria Maddalena Lino United States
C G Azar United States
David Goldschneider France
Olivia Gautier United States
Kimberly A. Meyers United States
Barbara Tanno Italy
Hitomi Tsuiji Japan
Jonathan Mandelbaum United States
Fenghua Zhou China
Ruth Ho relative to Loen M. Hansford Canada Loen M. Hansford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Loen M. Hansford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Ho. The network helps show where Ruth Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Ho Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Ho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2009225
2
Resistance to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells correlates with a loss of caspase-8 expression.
2001224
3
Resistance to chemotherapy mediated by TrkB in neuroblastomas.
2002179
4 2005115
5 201055
6 201127
7 201123
8 201220
9 200012
10
Rainbow round my shoulder
19802

About Ruth Ho

Ruth Ho is a scholar working on Neurology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (8 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), interferon and immune responses (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (1 paper) and Cell death mechanisms and regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (431 citations), Cancer Research (167 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations), Molecular Biology (536 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (120 citations). Ruth Ho has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Garrett M. Brodeur, Jane E. Minturn, Audrey E. Evans, Angelika Eggert, Naohiko Ikegaki, Radhika Iyer, Tomoro Hishiki, Anisha M. Simpson, Michael A. Grotzer and Tycho Jan Zuzak. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, Cancer Letters, Pediatric Blood & Cancer, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact