Ruth E. Rea

437 citations
7 papers · 358 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth E. Rea

7 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Ruth E. Rea
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Research and Theory 15
  • Leadership and Management 13
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 30
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
  • Sociology and Political Science 174
Replace Ivana Barać with:
Ivana Barać Croatia
Lynn Anderson United States
Fatma Arıkan Türkiye
Irene Ngune Australia
Rhianon J. Marshall Australia
Clay Gillrie Canada
Pilar Fuster Spain
Lori Button United Kingdom
Melissa Demery Varin Canada
Jayne Wright United Kingdom
Ruth E. Rea relative to Ivana Barać Croatia Ivana Barać's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Ivana Barać · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Rea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Rea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Rea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Rea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Rea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Rea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Rea. The network helps show where Ruth E. Rea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Rea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Rea Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Rea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2009201
2 200387
3 200635
4 201118
5 198912
6 19883
7
Emergency Nursing: Core Curriculum
19872

About Ruth E. Rea

Ruth E. Rea is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 7 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper), Education and Work Dynamics (1 paper), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (1 paper), Workplace Violence and Bullying (1 paper) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (15 citations), Leadership and Management (13 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (30 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (174 citations). Ruth E. Rea has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan L. Johnson, Sally York, Steven M. Teeny, Jozef Meško, Bonnie Mowinski Jennings, Ruth A. Anderson and Cynthia C. Scalzi. Their work appears in journals such as JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Nursing Administration Quarterly, Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, The Journal of Arthroplasty and University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact