Peter Bichier

3.9k total citations
51 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Peter Bichier is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Bichier has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 22 papers in Plant Science and 15 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Peter Bichier's work include Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (15 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (12 papers). Peter Bichier is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (15 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (12 papers). Peter Bichier collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Mexico. Peter Bichier's co-authors include Russell Greenberg, Stacy M. Philpott, Andrea Cruz Angón, Ivette Perfecto, Monika Egerer, Robert Reitsma, Robert A. Rice, Sunshine A. Van Bael, Heidi Liere and Shalene Jha and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, The Science of The Total Environment and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Bichier

48 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Bichier United States 27 1.3k 945 899 820 663 51 2.9k
Ingo Graß Germany 30 1.5k 1.2× 936 1.0× 792 0.9× 940 1.1× 620 0.9× 88 3.1k
Daniel S. Karp United States 30 1.2k 0.9× 1.4k 1.5× 1.3k 1.4× 685 0.8× 1.2k 1.9× 78 3.8k
Daniel S. Chapman United Kingdom 28 700 0.6× 937 1.0× 773 0.9× 548 0.7× 483 0.7× 73 2.5k
Teja Tscharntke Germany 24 1.8k 1.4× 1.2k 1.3× 1.6k 1.8× 1.1k 1.3× 826 1.2× 34 3.9k
Guadalupe Williams‐Linera Mexico 33 1.1k 0.9× 841 0.9× 1.9k 2.1× 766 0.9× 1.2k 1.8× 95 3.5k
Sunshine A. Van Bael United States 23 1.1k 0.9× 701 0.7× 599 0.7× 929 1.1× 275 0.4× 53 2.3k
Johan Ekroos Sweden 31 1.3k 1.0× 874 0.9× 1.2k 1.3× 731 0.9× 998 1.5× 78 3.0k
Stéphanie Aviron France 28 1.5k 1.2× 802 0.8× 1.3k 1.4× 812 1.0× 866 1.3× 57 3.1k
Shalene Jha United States 29 1.7k 1.4× 241 0.3× 411 0.5× 1.1k 1.4× 531 0.8× 84 2.9k
Clélia Sirami France 25 1.1k 0.9× 1.5k 1.6× 1.5k 1.7× 565 0.7× 1.3k 2.0× 45 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bichier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bichier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bichier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bichier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bichier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bichier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bichier. The network helps show where Peter Bichier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Bichier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Bichier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Bichier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Bichier. Peter Bichier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Lin, Brenda B., Peter Bichier, Heidi Liere, et al.. (2024). Community gardens support high levels of food production, but benefit distribution is uneven across the gardener community. Sustainability Science. 19(6). 2013–2026. 2 indexed citations
3.
Philpott, Stacy M., et al.. (2023). Promoting Beneficial Arthropods in Urban Agroecosystems: Focus on Flowers, Maybe Not Native Plants. Insects. 14(7). 576–576. 2 indexed citations
4.
Philpott, Stacy M., et al.. (2023). Land tenure security and luxury support plant species and trait diversity in urban community gardens. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7. 7 indexed citations
5.
Liere, Heidi, et al.. (2020). Social Context Influence on Urban Gardener Perceptions of Pests and Management Practices. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 4. 8 indexed citations
6.
Egerer, Monika, Stacy M. Philpott, Heidi Liere, et al.. (2017). People or place? Neighborhood opportunity influences community garden soil properties and soil-based ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystems Services & Management. 14(1). 32–44. 23 indexed citations
7.
Vannette, Rachel L., Peter Bichier, & Stacy M. Philpott. (2017). The presence of aggressive ants is associated with fewer insect visits to and altered microbe communities in coffee flowers. Basic and Applied Ecology. 20. 62–74. 11 indexed citations
8.
Egerer, Monika, et al.. (2017). Urban arthropods respond variably to changes in landscape context and spatial scale. Journal of Urban Ecology. 3(1). 80 indexed citations
9.
Bichier, Peter, et al.. (2016). Landscape and Local Correlates of Bee Abundance and Species Richness in Urban Gardens. Environmental Entomology. 45(3). 592–601. 105 indexed citations
10.
Bichier, Peter, et al.. (2015). Local and Landscape Correlates of Spider Activity Density and Species Richness in Urban Gardens. Environmental Entomology. 44(4). 1043–1051. 59 indexed citations
11.
Philpott, Stacy M., et al.. (2013). Local and landscape drivers of arthropod abundance, richness, and trophic composition in urban habitats. Urban Ecosystems. 17(2). 513–532. 104 indexed citations
12.
Moorhead, Leigh C., Stacy M. Philpott, & Peter Bichier. (2010). Epiphyte Biodiversity in the Coffee Agricultural Matrix: Canopy Stratification and Distance from Forest Fragments. Conservation Biology. 24(3). 737–746. 37 indexed citations
13.
Philpott, Stacy M., Wayne J. Arendt, Inge Armbrecht, et al.. (2008). Biodiversity Loss in Latin American Coffee Landscapes: Review of the Evidence on Ants, Birds, and Trees. Conservation Biology. 22(5). 1093–1105. 316 indexed citations
14.
Bael, Sunshine A. Van, Stacy M. Philpott, Russell Greenberg, et al.. (2008). BIRDS AS PREDATORS IN TROPICAL AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS. Ecology. 89(4). 928–934. 195 indexed citations
15.
Bael, Sunshine A. Van, et al.. (2007). Original Paper Bird diversity in cacao farms and forest fragments of western Panama.
16.
Philpott, Stacy M., Peter Bichier, Robert A. Rice, & Russell Greenberg. (2007). Field‐Testing Ecological and Economic Benefits of Coffee Certification Programs. Conservation Biology. 21(4). 975–985. 156 indexed citations
17.
Philpott, Stacy M., Peter Bichier, Robert A. Rice, & Russell Greenberg. (2007). Biodiversity conservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation. 17(8). 1805–1820. 51 indexed citations
18.
Philpott, Stacy M., Russell Greenberg, Peter Bichier, & Ivette Perfecto. (2004). Impacts of major predators on tropical agroforest arthropods: comparisons within and across taxa. Oecologia. 140(1). 140–149. 86 indexed citations
19.
Perfecto, Ivette, John Vandermeer, Guillermo Ibarra‐Núñez, et al.. (2004). GREATER PREDATION IN SHADED COFFEE FARMS: THE ROLE OF RESIDENT NEOTROPICAL BIRDS. Ecology. 85(10). 2677–2681. 188 indexed citations
20.
Greenberg, Russell, et al.. (2001). Nonbreeding Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of the Black-Throated Green Warbler Complex in Southeastern Mexico. Ornithological Applications. 103(1). 31–37. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ingo Graß Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel S. Karp Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel S. Chapman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Teja Tscharntke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Guadalupe Williams‐Linera Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sunshine A. Van Bael Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Johan Ekroos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stéphanie Aviron Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shalene Jha Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Clélia Sirami
Rankless by CCL
2026