Ruth E. Davies

1.1k citations
35 papers · 795 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth E. Davies

33 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers

Ruth E. Davies
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Research and Theory 22
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
  • Clinical Psychology 129
  • General Health Professions 85
  • Epidemiology 124
Replace Anne L. Derouin with:
Anne L. Derouin United States
Zoe Bradfield Australia
Maria Björk Sweden
Caroline G. Dorsen United States
Karlen E. Luthy United States
Divane de Vargas Brazil
Elizabeth Teixeira Brazil
Mirian Santos Paiva Brazil
Eliany Nazaré Oliveira Brazil
Hanna‐Leena Melender Finland
Ruth E. Davies relative to Anne L. Derouin United States Anne L. Derouin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Anne L. Derouin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Davies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Davies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Davies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Davies. The network helps show where Ruth E. Davies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Davies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Davies Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Davies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004153
2 2014149
3 2008120
4 200341
5 200541
6 201039
7 200936
8 201235
9 200930
10 201224
11 201418
12 201618
13
Tablet crushing and the law: the implications for nursing.
200315
14 201715
15 200311
16 20028
17 19996
18 20035
19 20164
20
New understandings of parental grief
20043

About Ruth E. Davies

Ruth E. Davies is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative and Oncologic Care (4 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (2 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers) and Health Services Management and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (22 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations), Clinical Psychology (129 citations), General Health Professions (85 citations) and Epidemiology (124 citations). Ruth E. Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Amy Brown, Gary Rolfe, Tessa E. Watts, Bryn Davis, J R Sibert, Richard Griffith, Karen Luyt, Kathryn L. Phillips, Stephen Ray and Vinaya K C Manchaiah. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Child Health Care, Maternal and Child Nutrition and Child Care Health and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact