Ruth E. Benedict

16 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ruth E. Benedict
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 933
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 648
  • Clinical Psychology 453
  • Occupational Therapy 87
  • Rehabilitation 80
Replace Katherine Langdon with:
Katherine Langdon Australia
Lesley Pritchard Canada
Franzina Coutinho Canada
Claire Galea Australia
Guro L. Andersen Norway
Allan Colver United Kingdom
Rosenbaum United States
Laura Vogtle United States
Eva Nordmark Sweden
Deborah E. Thorpe United States
Ruth E. Benedict relative to Katherine Langdon Australia Katherine Langdon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×22.8×
Katherine Langdon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Benedict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Benedict's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Benedict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Benedict more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Benedict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Benedict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Benedict. The network helps show where Ruth E. Benedict may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Benedict, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Benedict Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Benedict links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2008344
2 2013312
3 2011169
4 2009138
5 201666
6 200542
7 201540
8 201535
9 200734
10 201123
11 199917
12 201016
13 200316
14 20139
15 20088
16
National survey of children with special health care needs: Wisconsin-specific data.
20042

About Ruth E. Benedict

Ruth E. Benedict is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Speech and Hearing, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Occupational Therapy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (12 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (11 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (10 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (933 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (648 citations), Clinical Psychology (453 citations), Occupational Therapy (87 citations) and Rehabilitation (80 citations). Ruth E. Benedict has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Maureen S. Durkin, Marshalyn Yeargin‐Allsopp, Russell S. Kirby, Kim Van Naarden Braun, Nancy Doernberg, Carrie L. Arneson, Matthew J. Maenner, Martha S. Wingate, Robert T. Fitzgerald and Deborah Christensen. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Academic Pediatrics and Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026