Ruth Achten

2.0k citations
39 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Achten

39 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Ruth Achten
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Gastroenterology 226
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 448
  • Hepatology 182
  • Genetics 206
  • Reproductive Medicine 100
Replace Masaya Iwamuro with:
Masaya Iwamuro Japan
K.A. MacLennan United Kingdom
Rika Sakai Japan
Alberto A. Diaz‐Arias United States
Vasilis A. Constantinides United Kingdom
M Lecomte-Houcke France
Edoardo Rossi Italy
William G. Sauer United States
Ilaria Panzini Italy
Dominique Béchade France
Ruth Achten relative to Masaya Iwamuro Japan Masaya Iwamuro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Masaya Iwamuro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Achten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Achten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Achten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Achten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Achten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Achten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Achten. The network helps show where Ruth Achten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Achten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Achten Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Achten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003381
2 2017218
3 200183
4 200566
5 200262
6 202161
7 200257
8 200855
9 200552
10 200750
11 200248
12 200348
13 200434
14 200031
15 201829
16 201626
17 200124
18 200522
19 202022
20 200220

About Ruth Achten

Ruth Achten is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Urology, Genetics, Oncology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (4 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (226 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (448 citations), Hepatology (182 citations), Genetics (206 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (100 citations). Ruth Achten has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tania Roskams, Shi Qi Yang, Chris Verslype, R Devos, Anna Mae Diehl, Anne Durnez, G. Verhoef, Chris De Wolf‐Peeters, Brigitte Maes and Iwona Włodarska. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Histopathology, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and European Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact