Rupert G. Pegram
- Parasitology top 2%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Hilda Y. WassefHarry HoogstraalDave MooreM. T. K. KairoDorothy D. PeterkinMarilena Aquino de MuroJohn GeorgeC. Eddi
- Topics
- Vector-borne infectious diseases (12 papers)Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (5 papers)Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomEgypt
In The Last Decade
Rupert G. Pegram
17 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Parasitology 234
- Infectious Diseases 185
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 166
- Insect Science 165
- Plant Science 119
Countries citing papers authored by Rupert G. Pegram
This map shows the geographic impact of Rupert G. Pegram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rupert G. Pegram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rupert G. Pegram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rupert G. Pegram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rupert G. Pegram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rupert G. Pegram. The network helps show where Rupert G. Pegram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rupert G. Pegram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rupert G. Pegram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rupert G. Pegram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rupert G. Pegram. Rupert G. Pegram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Preliminary assessment of acaricide resistance in cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus populations from the Caribbean island of Martinique. [p081] | 1 |
| 2 | Amblyomma variegatum ticks and heartwater on three Caribbean Islands | 1 |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 54 |
About Rupert G. Pegram
Rupert G. Pegram is a scholar working on Parasitology, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (12 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (5 papers) and Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (234 citations), Insect Science (165 citations) and Infectious Diseases (185 citations). Rupert G. Pegram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Hilda Y. Wassef, Harry Hoogstraal, Dave Moore, M. T. K. Kairo, Dorothy D. Peterkin, Marilena Aquino de Muro, John George, C. Eddi, Valérie Pinarello and Sophie Molia. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Veterinary Parasitology and Journal of Parasitology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.