565 total citations 10 papers, 110 citations indexed
About
Rudolf Hilferding is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting.
According to data from OpenAlex, Rudolf Hilferding has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 110 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 1 paper in Economics and Econometrics and 1 paper in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Rudolf Hilferding's work include Business, Education, Mathematics Research (1 paper), Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (1 paper). Rudolf Hilferding is often cited by papers focused on Business, Education, Mathematics Research (1 paper), Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (1 paper). Rudolf Hilferding collaborates with scholars based in . Rudolf Hilferding's co-authors include Michael Barratt Brown, Paul M. Sweezy, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk and L. v. Bortkiewicz and has published in prestigious journals such as The Economic History Review, History of Political Economy and Éditions de Minuit eBooks.
Citations per year, relative to Rudolf Hilferding Rudolf Hilferding (= 1×)
peers
Knut Borchardt
Countries citing papers authored by Rudolf Hilferding
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rudolf Hilferding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rudolf Hilferding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rudolf Hilferding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rudolf Hilferding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rudolf Hilferding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rudolf Hilferding. The network helps show where Rudolf Hilferding may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rudolf Hilferding
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rudolf Hilferding.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rudolf Hilferding based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rudolf Hilferding. Rudolf Hilferding is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hilferding, Rudolf. (2000). Das Finanzkapital : eine Studie über die jüngste Entwicklung des Kapitalismus. Dietz eBooks.39 indexed citations
4.
Hilferding, Rudolf, et al.. (1996). Rudolf Hilferding: Theory and Politics of Democratic Socialism. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
5.
Hilferding, Rudolf. (1985). El capital financiero. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 92(1). 84–97.20 indexed citations
6.
Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von, Rudolf Hilferding, L. v. Bortkiewicz, & Paul M. Sweezy. (1984). Karl Marx and the Close of His System/Bohm-Bawerk's Criticism of Marx. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
7.
Hilferding, Rudolf, et al.. (1982). Zwischen den Stühlen, oder, Über die Unvereinbarkeit von Theorie und Praxis : Schriften Rudolf Hilferdings, 1904-1940. Dietz eBooks.4 indexed citations
Hilferding, Rudolf, et al.. (1970). Le capital financier : etude sur le developpement recent du capitalisme. Éditions de Minuit eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Hilferding, Rudolf, et al.. (1961). Il capitale finanziario. Feltrinelli eBooks.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.