Rüdiger Thul
Impact in
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
-
- stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Papers in
-
- stochastic dynamics and bifurcation 10
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 8
- Co-authors
- Stephen CoombesMartin D. BootmanH. Llewelyn RoderickMartin FalckeAlexander SkupinIoannis SmyrniasKevin ThurleySteven Niederer
- Journals
- Journal of Theoretical Biology (3 papers)Cold Spring Harbor Protocols (3 papers)Physical review. E (2 papers)European Journal of Applied Mathematics (2 papers)Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rüdiger Thul
30 papers receiving 495 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 234
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 108
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 117
- Sensory Systems 26
- Physiology 21
Countries citing papers authored by Rüdiger Thul
This map shows the geographic impact of Rüdiger Thul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rüdiger Thul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rüdiger Thul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rüdiger Thul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rüdiger Thul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rüdiger Thul. The network helps show where Rüdiger Thul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rüdiger Thul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 79 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 61 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 123 |
About Rüdiger Thul
Rüdiger Thul is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 32 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (11 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (10 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (7 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (234 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (108 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (117 citations), Sensory Systems (26 citations) and Physiology (21 citations). Rüdiger Thul has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Coombes, Martin D. Bootman, H. Llewelyn Roderick, Martin Falcke, Alexander Skupin, Ioannis Smyrnias, Kevin Thurley, Steven Niederer, Elizabeth M. Cherry and Flavio H. Fenton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, Physical review. E, European Journal of Applied Mathematics and Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.