Ruchira Pandey
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 10%
- Food Science
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Preethi S. GanapathyNeelam SharmaR. GowthamiAnuradha AgrawalK. P. S. ChandelAnjula PandeyRakesh SinghK. S. Negi
- Topics
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration (18 papers)Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (7 papers)Garlic and Onion Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruchira Pandey
28 papers receiving 306 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Plant Science 263
- Molecular Biology 192
- Complementary and alternative medicine 62
- Food Science 42
- Cell Biology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Ruchira Pandey
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruchira Pandey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruchira Pandey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruchira Pandey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruchira Pandey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruchira Pandey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruchira Pandey. The network helps show where Ruchira Pandey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruchira Pandey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruchira Pandey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruchira Pandey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruchira Pandey. Ruchira Pandey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 68 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | Fingerprinting of Traditional Medicines through RAPD Technology: - A Newer Approach | 2 |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | Wild Useful Species of Allium in India – Key to Identification | 3 |
| 14 | Distribution, diversity, uses and in vitro conservation of cultivated and wild Alliums - A brief review | 2 |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Ruchira Pandey
Ruchira Pandey is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (18 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (7 papers) and Garlic and Onion Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (62 citations), Plant Science (263 citations) and Molecular Biology (192 citations). Ruchira Pandey has collaborated with scholars based in India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Preethi S. Ganapathy, Neelam Sharma, R. Gowthami, Anuradha Agrawal, K. P. S. Chandel, Anjula Pandey, Rakesh Singh, K. S. Negi, J. Radhamani and Nutan Kaushik. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Botany, Plant Science and Scientia Horticulturae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.